The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Gyroscopic Compass, by T. W. Chalmers

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of
the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.org.  If you are not located in the United States, you'll have
to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook.



Title: The Gyroscopic Compass

Author: T. W. Chalmers

Release Date: May 22, 2018 [EBook #57200]

Language: English

Character set encoding: UTF-8

*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE GYROSCOPIC COMPASS ***




Produced by deaurider, Charlie Howard, and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
file was produced from images generously made available
by The Internet Archive)









Transcriber’s Note: Italics are indicated by _underscores_.




  _THE ENGINEER SERIES_


  THE GYROSCOPIC COMPASS

  A NON-MATHEMATICAL TREATMENT




  _THE ENGINEER SERIES_

  THE
  GYROSCOPIC COMPASS

  A NON-MATHEMATICAL TREATMENT

  BY
  T. W. CHALMERS, B.SC., A.M.I.MECH.E.

  (ON THE EDITORIAL STAFF OF “THE ENGINEER”)

  ILLUSTRATED

  LONDON
  CONSTABLE & COMPANY, LTD.
  10 ORANGE STREET, LEICESTER SQUARE. W.C.
  1920




_Printed in Great Britain_




PREFACE


The chapters composing this book originally appeared as a series of
articles in _The Engineer_ during January, February, and March of
the current year. The articles were written in the belief that many
readers would welcome a clear and full, non-mathematical exposition
of the gyroscopic compass, its theory and practical construction. The
gyro-compass represents at once the most involved and abstruse and
the most important and valuable of all the practical applications
to which the gyroscope, so far, has been put. As a navigational
instrument it is now in practically universal use in all the chief war
navies of the world, and is to-day being adopted by several important
representatives of the mercantile marine. Remarkable figures were shown
to the author recently which demonstrated that not only was navigation
by the gyro-compass much more accurate than by the magnetic compass,
but that the increased accuracy reduced the length of the voyage of
a mercantile vessel to an extent that resulted in saving a quantity
of fuel the value of which on a single trip would go a considerable
way towards meeting the extra first cost of the gyro-compass. Bearing
these facts in mind the author from the outset endeavoured not only
to dispense with mathematics but to avoid introducing anything except
the most familiar physical principles and conceptions, for his object
was to explain the mode of action of the gyro-compass for the benefit
primarily of the navigating officer--naval and mercantile. If some
readers should find the treatment in places unduly prolix, the author
trusts they will exercise leniency and regard the fault as being
caused by the author’s unwillingness to take any risks in expounding a
subject, no part of which can be understood incompletely without grave
hurt to the understanding of the whole.

            T. W. C.

  LONDON, _May, 1920_.




CONTENTS


   CHAP.                                                            PAGE
     I.  INTRODUCTION                                                  1

    II.  ELEMENTARY GYROSCOPIC PHENOMENA                               4

   III.  THE GYROSCOPE AND THE ROTATION OF THE EARTH                  15

    IV.  DAMPING THE VIBRATIONS OF THE GYRO-COMPASS                   29

     V.  THE DAMPING SYSTEM OF THE ANSCHÜTZ (1910) COMPASS            42

    VI.  THE DAMPING SYSTEM OF THE SPERRY COMPASS                     52

   VII.  THE DAMPING SYSTEM OF THE BROWN COMPASS                      59

  VIII.  THE LATITUDE ERROR                                           65

    IX.  THE NORTH STEAMING ERROR                                     71

     X.  THE BALLISTIC DEFLECTION                                     81

    XI.  THE QUADRANTAL ERROR                                         91

   XII.  THE ELIMINATION OF THE QUADRANTAL ERROR                     107

  XIII.  CENTRIFUGAL FORCES DURING QUADRANTAL ROLLING                130

   XIV.  THE ANSCHÜTZ (1910) COMPASS                                 138

    XV.  THE SPERRY COMPASS                                          142

   XVI.  THE BROWN COMPASS                                           148

  XVII.  THE ANSCHÜTZ (1912) COMPASS                                 154

         INDEX                                                       165




LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS


  FIG.                                                              PAGE
   1.  Model gyroscope with three degrees of freedom                   4

   2.  Model gyroscope with three degrees of freedom                   7

   3.  Model gyroscope, frictional transmission of turning moment      9

   4.  Model gyroscope, one degree of freedom lost                    11

   5.  Model gyroscope, second degree of freedom lost                 12

   6.  Model gyroscope, lost degrees of freedom restored              13

   7.  Elementary gyroscope at equator                                15

   8.  Gyroscopic clock                                               16

   9.  Elementary gyro-compass                                        18

  10.  Elementary compass at equator                                  20

  11.  Elementary compass at 55 deg. N. Lat.                          24

  12.  Compass at equator and near North Pole                         26

  13.  Pendulum and compass                                           32

  14.  Damped and undamped vibrations                                 35

  15.  Damped pendulum                                                37

  16.  Air-blast damping system of Anschütz (1910) compass            43

  17.  Free and damped motion of axle                                 49

  18.  Damping curve from Anschütz (1910) compass                     50

  19.  Damping system of Sperry compass                               53

  20.  Action of excentric pin in Sperry compass                      55

  21.  Action of excentric pin in Sperry compass                      57

  22.  Gyro-pendulum with axle tilted                                 60

  23.  Damping system of Brown compass                                62

  24.  The north steaming error at 0 deg. and 60 deg. N.              72

  25.  Sperry correction mechanism for latitude and north steaming
           errors                                                     76

  26.  Ballistic force on compass when ship’s speed changes           83

  27.  Ballistic force on compass when ship’s speed changes           84

  28.  Ballistic deflection                                           86

  29.  Effect of rolling on due north course                          93

  30.  Effect of rolling on due west course                           94

  31.  External gimbal mounting                                       97

  32.  Effect of rolling on a due north course (simple
           mounting)                                                  98

  33.  Effect of rolling on a due north course (external gimbal
           mounting)                                                  99

  34.  Ship rolling on N.W. course                                   101

  35.  Sperry compass on N.W. course                                 108

  36.  Sperry ballistic gyro                                         111

  37.  Stabilised excentric pin (Sperry compass)                     112

  38.  Diagram of Brown compass                                      113

  39.  Oil control bottles (Brown compass)                           115

  40.  Brown compass on west course                                  117

  41.  Diagram of Anschütz (1912) compass                            121

  42.  Plans of gyros (Anschütz compass)                             122

  43.  Centrifugal forces on a pendulum                              131

  44.  The Anschütz (1910) compass                                   139

  45.  The Sperry compass removed from binnacle                      143

  46.  The Sperry compass                                            144

  47.  The Brown compass removed from binnacle                       148

  48.  The Brown compass removed from binnacle                       149

  49.  The Brown compass                                             150

  50.  Plan of Anschütz (1912) compass                               155

  51.  Sectional elevation of Anschütz (1912) compass                159




THE GYROSCOPIC COMPASS:

A NON-MATHEMATICAL TREATMENT




CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION


At this date it is, or should be, unnecessary to open an account
of the gyroscopic compass with a discussion of the defects of the
ordinary magnetic compass. These defects are too well known to require
mention. Recent advances in naval architecture, particularly in warship
construction, and very especially the building of submarines, have
resulted in the magnetic compass becoming less and less useful for
accurate navigation, primarily because of the upsetting influence
exercised upon it by masses of steel or iron in its neighbourhood. It
may still serve, perhaps, for the surface navigation of submarines, but
for submerged runs the use of a gyro-compass is all but essential. In
warships the weight of the guns and turrets is now so heavy that the
magnetic compass can hardly remain unaffected by them and is materially
influenced when the guns are trained to different directions. The
shells themselves as they are discharged are also said to be a cause
of error in the reading of the magnetic compass, for they tend in
most positions of the ship to drag the needle after them by magnetic
attraction as they pass along the bore of the gun.

The value of the gyro-compass is not, however, recognised only in the
world’s war navies. It is becoming increasingly appreciated in the
mercantile marine, and there can be but little doubt that the device
will soon be extensively employed on passenger liners and merchantmen
generally. In the following pages we attempt to give an account of the
working of the gyro-compass and to describe the forms assumed by the
device in practice--sufficiently fully to illustrate the theory without
going into any great detail on the constructional side--and to do so
without depending upon the reader’s possessing mathematical knowledge.

It is to be remarked that it is much easier to treat the gyroscope and
all its practical applications mathematically than non-mathematically,
and that the avoidance of mathematics generally leads to a discussion
of this essentially mathematical device which is unscientific,
unsound, and of very little practical value. We trust that our account
will be found to avoid these defects and that it will prove useful
and enlightening to those who have so far failed to understand the
behaviour of the gyroscope and its applications by reason of the
fact that hitherto all trustworthy descriptions have been couched
in a highly mathematical form or have been mere mathematics thinly
disguised in written words. It is admittedly not easy to understand
gyroscopic phenomena either with or without the aid of mathematics, but
on the other hand many of the difficulties of the subject are largely
artificial. Thus the mathematician, when dealing with it, seems to
be much more concerned with his equations than in creating a mental
picture of what they represent; yet every one of his equations can be
or should be capable of being represented physically. Those who set
out to avoid mathematics do not usually succeed in giving a discussion
sufficiently complete to be of any practical service afterwards to
their readers. Thus in dealing with the gyro-compass the so-called
“popular” description in most cases begins and ends with an explanation
of why the device possesses directive force when it is set up at the
equator. It is quite easy to demonstrate the existence of such force
at the equator. It is not so easy to show non-mathematically how the
directive force is generated and applied when the compass is situated
north or south of the equator. The necessity for damping the horizontal
vibrations of the gyro-axle and how the required damping force is
applied in practice are still more difficult to explain, while the
errors to which the gyro-compass is open--such as the latitude and
the quadrantal errors--are even more trying to make clear. The latter
subjects are usually neglected in the “popular” account of the compass.
Yet without some means of damping the vibrations referred to or of
eliminating or allowing for the various errors, the compass, even
though it can be shown to possess directive force in all latitudes,
would be utterly useless--especially on board ship--as a direction
indicator.

Finally, it may be remarked that while the gyro-compass represents
to-day probably the most intricate and involved practical application
of the gyroscope, it is not the only one of importance. This fact is to
our advantage, for if we succeed in explaining the theory and working
of the gyro-compass we shall have succeeded in placing the reader in a
position enabling him readily to understand all other devices in which
a gyroscope is employed or in which gyroscopic phenomena are developed.




CHAPTER II

ELEMENTARY GYROSCOPIC PHENOMENA


Let a wheel A (Fig. 1) be mounted on an axle B C journalled within a
horizontal ring D. Let this ring in turn be mounted on journals E F
within a vertical ring G and, further, let this vertical ring be
carried on journals H J within a vertical frame K. This arrangement
constitutes a gyroscopic system having three degrees of freedom,
because relatively to the frame K the wheel may turn about three axes
B C, E F, and H J mutually at right angles to each other and because,
if the wheel is set spinning on its axle, gyroscopic properties will be
manifested.

[Illustration: FIG. 1. Model Gyroscope, with Three Degrees of Freedom.]

The following is a brief statement of the gyroscopic properties
manifested when the wheel is spun on its axle:

(_a_) Let the wheel be spinning in the direction of the arrow L and
let a weight W be hung on the horizontal ring at the end B of the
axle. The movement produced by this weight is not a rotation of the
horizontal ring, and the wheel within it, about the axis E F. Instead,
the horizontal ring remains horizontal and the whole system inside the
square frame sets off rotating at a uniform speed about the axis H J
in the direction of the arrow marked M on the horizontal ring. This
rotation or precession, as it is called, will be maintained so long as
the weight W remains in action. There is here no question of perpetual
motion. The work expended in overcoming the friction at the vertical
journals is derived from the energy of the spinning wheel, and when
this energy is exhausted the phenomenon ceases. The phenomenon can, in
fact, only be maintained indefinitely by expending power to drive the
wheel against the leakage of energy through friction at the journals
of the axle and the vertical axis H J. A closer examination of the
phenomenon would show that there is a slight rocking motion of the
horizontal ring on its axis E F, and therefore an additional leakage
of energy at the journals of this axis. This rocking motion can be
neglected for our present purposes. It is sufficiently accurate to say
that the horizontal ring remains horizontal.

(_b_) The speed of the precession is proportional to the weight W
and to the speed of rotation of the wheel on its axle. For instance,
doubling the weight doubles the speed of precession.

(_c_) If the direction of spin of the wheel is reversed the direction
of the precession is also reversed.

(_d_) If the spin of the wheel is in the direction L, and if instead
of attaching a weight at the end B of the axle we exert an _upward_
force at this point the precession developed will be _opposed_ to the
direction of the arrow M.

(_e_) If instead of trying to rotate the wheel about the axis E F by
means of a weight or force applied at B we attempt to turn it about the
vertical axis H J by applying a horizontal force V to the outer ring,
the wheel will not turn about the vertical axis H J, but about the
horizontal axis E F, the end B of the axle rising up towards H.

(_f_) As before, the direction of this movement is reversed by
reversing either the direction of spin of the wheel or action of the
force V. If both are reversed simultaneously the direction of the
movement produced by the applied force is not altered.

The behaviour set forth above can be summarised in a general rule as
follows:--If to a spinning wheel possessing three degrees of freedom
a force be applied tending to turn the wheel about some axis X X, the
actual motion produced will not be about X X but about some other axis
Y Y; this axis Y Y will be such that rotation about it will tend to
bring the axle of the spinning wheel into coincidence with or parallel
with the axis X X; the direction of the rotation produced about Y Y
will be such that when the condition of coincidence or parallelism
is reached the spin of the wheel will coincide in direction with the
rotation we are attempting to produce about the axis X X.

Taking case (_a_) (Fig. 1), it will be seen that the axis E F about
which we are attempting to produce rotation by means of the weight W,
together with the weight W itself, is of necessity carried round by
the precession in the direction M at the same rate as the axle of the
spinning wheel. The axle in this case cannot therefore place itself in
coincidence with the axis of the applied force. But it does its best to
do so. The precession persists and is an expression of the fruitless
chase of the axis E F by the axle B C.

[Illustration: FIG. 2. Model Gyroscope, with Three Degrees of Freedom.]

If, however, the weight is attached by some kind of sliding connection
on the horizontal ring in such a way that its line of action remains
stationary in space, then the axis about which we are attempting to
produce rotation will also remain stationary in the position occupied
by the axis E F before precession commences. In this case it is quite
possible for the axle of the wheel to place itself in coincidence with
the axis of the applied force. Precession about H J through 90 deg.
will accomplish this result, as indicated in Fig. 2. The weight W is
now acting at a point on the horizontal ring where it ceases to have
any tendency to turn the wheel about the axis E F. When, therefore, the
position of coincidence is reached precession ceases and the system
comes to rest in this position.

If the experiment were actually made it would be found that the
momentum acquired by the system during the 90 deg. turn would carry
the axle through the position of coincidence with the axis of the
applied force. But immediately the axle passes to the opposite side
the force W is exerted on a point of the horizontal ring between F and
C. The action of the force passing on to this, the opposite, segment
of the ring reverses the conditions under which the system started
its movement and as a result precession in the direction opposed to
the arrow M is set up. The axle thus tends to recover its position of
coincidence and in the end settles down to a vibratory motion from side
to side of the axis of the applied weight. Friction at the vertical
journals will “damp” this vibratory motion, the amplitudes of the
swings will decrease, and the axle will ultimately settle in steady
coincidence with the axis of the applied force. In this condition the
force will have no further effect on the system beyond throwing a
bending moment on to the vertical axis.

[Illustration: FIG. 3. Frictional Transmission of Turning Moment.]

Instead of trying to make the wheel rotate about the axis E F by
applying a weight to the inner ring as in Fig. 1, let us, as shown
in Fig. 3, mount the square frame K on a horizontal axis N P and
attach the weight W to an arm fixed on the frame. The axes N P and E F
being--at least initially--collinear, the effect of this arrangement
is to throw a turning moment on to the wheel about the axis E F just
as does the weight W in Fig. 1. It is to be noticed, however, that the
moment of the weight W in Fig. 3 about the axis N P is transmitted to
the inner ring as a moment about the axis E F solely because of the
friction existing at the journals of the axis E F. This friction may be
very small, so that the turning moment received by the wheel is only a
very small fraction of the turning moment exerted by the weight W about
N P. The effect of the arrangement is thus exactly the same as would
be produced in the arrangement Fig. 1 if we reduced the weight W to
a hundredth or a thousandth of its value. In other words, precession
about the vertical axis H J will set in in the direction of the arrow
M just as before, but the speed of this precession will be only a
hundredth or a thousandth of the previous value.

It is not very important to trace out the behaviour of the system shown
in Fig. 3 beyond a very brief period immediately after the weight W is
applied. The point of importance is that the precession produced by the
weight is very slow, and therefore that in a given interval of time the
amount precessed is very small. Further, the rate of the precession
depends solely upon the friction at the journals of the axis E F and
not upon the weight W or the movement of the frame K except in so far
as these factors affect the friction. The less the friction the less
will be the rate of precession and the amount precessed in a given
time. Thus by mounting the axis E F on knife edges the friction can
be made so small that the precession produced by the weight W becomes
immeasurable. Hence we deduce that if friction is substantially absent
at the axis E F the frame K might be violently rocked on the axis N P
or even set into continuous rotation without causing the axle of the
wheel either to dip or to precess.

Continuing the argument, we might mount the square frame on a vertical
axis and attempt to produce rotation of the wheel about the axis H J
by applying a horizontal force to one side of the square frame instead
of a force V on the outer ring as shown in Fig. 1. A similar result
would be obtained. Granted an all but total absence of friction at the
journals of the vertical axis H J, the precession produced about the
horizontal axis E F would be immeasurably small. Thus the frame might
be set into violent motion about its vertical axis without causing the
axle either to rotate in a horizontal plane or to precess in a vertical
one.

[Illustration: FIG. 4. One Degree of Freedom Lost.]

Finally, if the square frame were mounted on a horizontal axis
collinear with the axle B C it might obviously be rotated about this
axis without affecting the system otherwise than by increasing or
reducing the rubbing speed of the axle B C in its bearings.

Since pure translation of the frame in any direction cannot apply a
turning moment to the system about any axis, and as rotation of the
frame about any one of the three principal axes has no effect which
is measurable on the orientation of the axle, it follows that, given
substantial absence of friction at the axes E F and H J, the axle of
the wheel will remain constantly pointing parallel with its original
position, no matter how the frame K may be moved or turned about.

[Illustration: FIG. 5. Second Degree of Freedom Lost.]

The gyroscopic system shown in Fig. 1 has, as we have said, “three
degrees of freedom,” because its wheel is free to spin about three
different axes mutually at right angles. It is to be carefully noted
that it can only truly be said to have three degrees of freedom so long
as the inner ring and the parts inside it are not rotated on the axis
E F away from the position which in Fig. 1 they are shown as occupying
relatively to the outer ring. Thus rotation of the wheel on its axle
or of the whole system inside the square frame on the axis H J leaves
the three axes B C, E F, H J undisturbed at right angles to each other.
But rotation of the inner ring and the parts inside it on the axis E F
tends to destroy one of the degrees of freedom. If, for instance, the
inner ring is rotated through 90 deg., as shown in Fig. 4, the axle B C
and the axis H J will coincide in direction. In this position the wheel
cannot be rotated about a horizontal axis at right angles to E F and
has therefore virtually only two degrees of freedom, namely, about the
axis E F and about the axis H B C J. Again, if with the inner ring in
the position shown in Fig. 4 the outer ring is turned through 90 deg.
relatively to the square frame, the system assumes the configuration
shown in Fig. 5 and the wheel loses the power of rotating about a
horizontal axis in the plane of the square frame.

[Illustration: FIG. 6. Lost Degrees of Freedom Restored.]

If, then, in any application of the gyroscope it is necessary to
guarantee that the system shall have three degrees of freedom in all
possible configurations, the simple mounting shown in Fig. 1 will not
serve the purpose. It can be made to do so in the manner shown in Fig.
6, namely, by mounting the square frame inside a gimbal ring X, which
in turn is supported by a frame Y, the two new axes T U and V W being
at right angles to each other. In the position shown in Fig. 4 the new
axis T U would restore the lost third degree of freedom, while the
second new axis V W would restore the degree of freedom lost when the
system assumed the configuration shown in Fig. 5.

In the gyro-compass it is necessary to guarantee that the spinning
wheel in all possible configurations shall have three degrees of
freedom, and accordingly we find the wheel mounted in a manner
reproducing the features of Fig. 6. On the other hand, the majority
of the movements which the compass system is called upon to make do
not entail anything except very small degrees of rotation of the inner
ring and wheel about the axis E F (Fig. 1), and therefore for most
purposes the simple mounting there shown reproduces the required three
degrees of freedom sufficiently closely to permit us to use it for
demonstration purposes. In one very important portion of our subsequent
discussion, however--namely, that dealing with the effect on a marine
gyro-compass produced by rolling and pitching of the vessel--it will be
necessary for us to take cognisance of the fact that the square frame
shown in Fig. 1 is not fixed directly to the ship’s deck, but is really
carried in gimbals as shown in Fig. 6.




CHAPTER III

THE GYROSCOPE AND THE ROTATION OF THE EARTH


Let us now suppose that the gyroscopic system shown in Fig. 1--without
the weight W--is placed on the equator as represented at P (Fig. 7),
and that the axle is set pointing due east and west as at B C. At the
end of an interval of time, say two hours, the earth will have rotated
through some angle α, say 30 deg., and will have carried the gyroscope
with it to the position Q. The square frame has thus clearly been
inclined relatively to its original position. It has, in fact, suffered
the exact equivalent of a direct translation R together with a pure
rotation about a horizontal axis through E of amount α. The translation
leaves the system unaffected, but the rotation of the frame results in
the frame moving relatively to the axle, wheel, and inner ring. The
axle, in fact, remains parallel with its original position at P. It
is still pointing east and west, but the frame is now inclined to it
and, relatively to the horizontal surface of the earth at Q, the axle
is dipping at an angle β which is equal to α--or 30 deg. Actually,
if we fixed a disc to the square frame and a hand to the inner ring,
as indicated in Fig. 8, the system as erected at the equator would
form a twenty-four hour clock indicating strictly accurate sidereal
time as distinct from mean solar time. To an observer on the earth
the hand would appear to travel clockwise round the disc once in
twenty-four hours. Actually, however, the hand would not rotate, but
would remain constantly parallel with its original position, while
the disc would travel anti-clockwise relatively to the hand and would
make one complete turn in twenty-four hours. The hand would remain
parallel with its original position by virtue of the fact already
stated, namely, that the force applied to the inner ring through its
all-but-frictionless supports is very small, and in any event does
not turn the hand clockwise, but causes the wheel, inner ring, and
hand to precess about the vertical axis H J. The rate at which this
precession took place would be a measure of the success with which we
had eliminated friction at the horizontal axis E F.

[Illustration: FIG. 7. Elementary Gyroscope at Equator.]

[Illustration: FIG. 8. Gyroscopic Clock.]

It might be thought that the system would without further addition
serve as a compass, for if it maintains its axle constantly pointing
in one direction it is just as good as a compass which always points
its needle towards the magnetic north. In the magnetic compass,
however, the needle has a directive force applied to it which enables
it to recover its standard direction if it should be accidentally
deflected from it. In the gyroscopic system we have been considering
there is no such directive force. The axle will remain pointing in
one direction, it is true, but the system is indifferent as to what
that direction may be. If the axle is accidentally deflected it will
remain pointing in the new direction as consistently as it did before
in the originally set direction. As a substitute for the ordinary
compass, then, the success of the device would depend upon the success
with which accidental deflecting forces were prevented from acting
on the axle after it had been set in a known direction. In practice,
as Dr. Anschütz found in his early investigations, it is excessively
difficult, if not quite impossible, to construct a gyroscopic system in
which the centre of gravity and the centre of suspension are absolutely
coincident. As a result a very minute gravity torque is thrown on the
system, and in consequence the axle very slowly precesses away from
the original set direction. This fact and the complication of parts
required to give practical effect to the idea led Dr. Anschütz to
abandon his early attempts at providing a compass substitute of the
apparently simple nature described above.

[Illustration: FIG. 9. Elementary Gyro-Compass.]

An addition to the system of a very simple kind in itself not only
endows the axle with directive force, but makes the direction which
it seeks the north and south one, and thus converts the system into a
device possessing the familiar property of the compass. This addition
consists of a pendulum-like weight S (Fig. 9), attached below the wheel
by a stirrup fixed to the inner ring so that the weight, stirrup, inner
ring, axle, and wheel may swing as a whole on the horizontal axis E F.

Let us suppose that the system with this addition is set up at the
equator and that the axle this time is aligned at right angles to the
equator so that the end B, as shown at I (Fig. 10), points due north.
In this condition the inner ring is horizontal and the weight S is
vertically below the pendulum axis E F. No turning moment is therefore
being applied by gravity to the wheel. If through imperfection of
workmanship the centre of suspension of the system is not absolutely
coincident with the centre of gravity before the weight S and its
stirrup are attached, then the minute gravity torque arising from the
lack of coincidence will be balanced automatically by the weight, the
inner ring taking up some position minutely inclined to the horizontal.
There will thus under all conditions be no resultant turning moment
applied by gravity to the system as thus set up. In addition, the axle,
lying north and south as it does, is aligned parallel with the earth’s
polar diameter. Consequently the rotation of the earth can only move
it parallel with its original position, and therefore does not tend to
cause relative motion between it and the square frame. We conclude,
then, that in this north and south position of the axle the system is
not acted upon by any force or influence tending to cause the axle to
depart from the north and south position.

[Illustration: FIG. 10. Elementary Compass at Equator.]

Now let us suppose that the axle by some agency is forced into
parallelism with the equator so that the end B points due east as
indicated at II (Fig. 10). Immediately after it takes up this position
the tendency of the axle to remain parallel with this, its new
original, direction becomes manifested in attempted relative motion
between the axle, wheel, and inner ring on the one hand and the square
frame on the other. Thus as the earth rotates the axle, etc., tend to
set themselves relatively to the frame in the position shown at III.
In this position, however, the weight S being rigidly suspended from
the inner ring, is no longer vertically below the pendulum axis E F.
Gravity acting upon the weight therefore applies a turning force to
the wheel, etc., about the axis E F. The system is thus under the same
conditions as those represented in Fig. 1, when the weight W is hung on
the inner ring at B. Precession about the vertical axis therefore sets
in, in the direction M (Fig. 1), so that the end B of the axle swings
round from the east towards the north.

Let us reset the system in position I, and then by some agency cause
the axle again to align itself parallel with the equator, this time,
however, with the end B pointing due west as shown at IV (Fig. 10). As
before, the rotation of the earth combined with the tendency of the
axle to remain parallel with the new west and east position results in
attempted relative motion between the axle, etc., and the square frame,
so that in a little time the system would adopt the configuration
shown at V. In this configuration, however, gravity as before applies
through the weight S a turning force about the pendulum axis E F. Now,
comparing the two configurations III and V, it will be seen that,
mere reference letters or similar distinguishing marks being washed
out, they are indistinguishable except for one fact: the wheel is
rotating in opposite directions. If with the system as arranged in
Fig. 1 we reverse the direction of spin of the wheel without reversing
the direction of the applied force W, then, as we know already, the
direction of the precession will be reversed. Precession about the
vertical axis will take place in the direction opposed to the arrow M.
Hence in the configuration shown at V (Fig. 10), the precession induced
by the action of gravity on the weight S causes the end B of the axle
to swing up from due west towards the north.

We are thus led to identify the end B of the axle as the north-seeking
end and the end C as the south-seeking. With B pointing due north as
at I, there is no force acting on the system tending to make the axle
depart from the north and south direction. If B is swung over to the
east or west--or intermediately, as may be taken for granted--a force
is called into play tending to move the end B back towards the north.
It follows, therefore, that the resting position of the axle is the
north and south one with the end B pointing north.

It may be said, perhaps, that we have neglected to discuss what happens
if from the position I the wheel is turned by some agency right round
until the end B of the axle points due south. In this condition there
is no resultant gravity torque on the pendulum axis, and the axle is
lying parallel with the earth’s polar axis, so that the rotation of
the earth does not cause relative motion between the wheel, etc., and
the frame. Just as in the original configuration I, there is thus in
this condition no force applied to the system tending to make the end
B swing away from the pole. But as the reader may readily establish
for himself by reversing the arrows and reference letters in the five
diagrams of Fig. 10, the slightest departure of the end B of the axle
from the south-pointing direction towards either side of the meridian
will call into play a force which will cause the end B to precess
up towards the _north_. With the wheel spinning in the direction we
have shown throughout our illustrations the only _stable_ position of
equilibrium for the axle is the north and south with the end B pointing
north. It may be pointed out that the magnetic needle can, like the
gyro-compass axle, assume a position of unstable equilibrium with the
north-seeking end pointing south.

A point of very great practical importance into which to inquire is
the magnitude of the directive force, the existence of which, when
the axle is deflected from the north and south position, we have just
demonstrated. This directive force or restoring moment, as will have
been gathered from our explanation, increases with the deflection
from the north, being a maximum when the axle is lying east and west
or west and east. Its magnitude in any position of the axle depends
upon (_a_) the speed of rotation of the earth on its polar axis, (_b_)
the speed of the spinning wheel on its axle, and (_c_) the mass, or,
more correctly, the moment of inertia, of the wheel. The first item
is small--0.0007 of a revolution per minute--and is quite beyond our
control. The second factor is consequently made as large as possible,
while the third is also made large, but a limit is placed to our choice
by questions of safety and temperature rise at the high speeds adopted
for the spin of the wheel. In the following table we give the values of
these factors for three of the types of gyro-compass to be described
later.

   Compass    Wheel diam.  Wheel weight   Speed
                  in.          lbs.       r.p.m.
  Anschütz[1]     6            10         20,000
  Sperry         12            45          8,600
  Brown           4             4¼        15,000

The value of the directive force for the same three gyro-compasses and
for an ordinary magnetic compass is given in the next table, (1) for
the axle--or needle--lying due east and west, and (2) for the axle--or
needle--deflected 1 deg. east or west of north--true or magnetic.


_Directive Force at Equator._

               Axle (or needle)      Axle (or needle)
                  E. and W.        1 deg. E. or W. of N.
               Force   Leverage      Force   Leverage
               Grains    in.         Grains    in.
  Anschütz       145      1            2        1
  Sperry.       1140      1           20        1
  Brown           12      1             ⅕       1
  Magnetic[2]     40      1             ⅔       1

[Illustration: FIG. 11. Elementary Compass at 55 deg. N. Lat.]

We have now to explain how the gyro-pendulum system manifests its
compass-like property when it is transferred from the equator to some
degree of latitude north or south. In Fig. 11 we represent the system
as set up in the latitude of the British Isles. The axle is horizontal
and the end B is pointing due east. In this configuration the earth’s
rotation is, through the action of gravity on the pendulum bob S,
trying to make the wheel turn round the earth’s polar axis once every
twenty-four hours. As before, in accordance with the fundamental
property of the gyroscope, the wheel will try to set its axle into
coincidence with or parallel with the axis about which it is being
forced to rotate. In other words, the wheel will endeavour to turn
in such a way as to align its axle along V U with the end B towards
U. This movement can be effected by a rotation about the vertical
axis H J through a right angle combined with a rotation about the
horizontal axis E F through an angle θ equal to the latitude of the
station at which the system is set up. The rotation about the vertical
axis H J does not result in deflecting the weight S away from the plumb
line, and therefore can be completely fulfilled. The rotation about
the horizontal axis does, however, affect the bob. The axle, having
executed the horizontal portion of its movement, is pointing its end B
due north, but this end, unlike its behaviour at the equator, manifests
a desire to rise vertically so as to align the axle along V U. Its
desire to do so is resisted by the bob S, and the axle therefore fails
to complete the full movement.

The axle is thus held substantially horizontal with its end B
pointing to the north. As the earth rotates the desire of the axle
to align itself parallel with the polar axis persists. In attempting
continuously to fulfil this desire it acquires a slight upward tilt,
which is sufficient to bring the pendulum weight into action. With the
weight thus slightly deflected towards the north a moment is applied to
the wheel which tends to turn the wheel about the horizontal axis E F
in such a way as to bring the end B down again to the horizontal plane.
Such a moment, as we know from the fundamental rule of the gyroscope,
will actually produce precession about the vertical axis H J, the
direction of this precession being such as to cause the end B to move
away from the north towards the _west_.

The fact, then, that the axle is prevented from aligning itself
completely parallel with the earth’s polar axis thus apparently
results, once it has found the north, in making it wander, in northern
latitudes, towards the west. This is not so. Once the axle has _found_
the north a steady uniform precession towards the west is required to
_maintain_ it on the north. Thus in Fig. 12 let A be the wheel and
axle of the compass when it finds the north. If the axle maintained
this alignment then some time later it would assume the position shown
dotted at D; that is to say, it would be pointing towards east of
north. To maintain it on the north it must rotate westwardly through
the angle ϕ in the interval between A and D. As this angle ϕ grows with
the interval the required rotation is really equivalent to a steady
uniform precession towards the west.

[Illustration: FIG. 12. Compass at Equator and near North Pole.]

If the compass in Fig. 12 is practically at the north pole it is clear
that to hold the end B of the axle on the north the axle has to precess
about the vertical axis H J of the compass mounting at the rate of
practically one complete revolution per twenty-four hours--that is,
0.0007 revolution per minute. At the equator the required rate of
precession about H J is zero, for any movement about this axis will
carry the axle away from the north. At intermediate latitudes the
precession required to hold the axle on the north has an intermediate
value. Its value for any latitude θ is, in fact, 0.0007 × sin θ in
revolutions per minute.

Thus as the latitude is changed the required rate of precession also
changes. So, too, does the angle θ (Fig. 11), by which the axle fails
to reach parallelism with the earth’s polar axis, and consequently so
does the strength with which the axle desires to reach this alignment.
As the equator is left farther and farther behind, then, the axle comes
to rest pointing north with a greater and greater upward tilt from
the horizontal. The applied moment of the weight S thus increases.
It increases just at the rate necessary to give the required rate of
westerly precession for the particular latitude in which the compass
is at any moment stationed. Should anything prevent the axle from
acquiring the tilt appropriate to the latitude, or should the westerly
precession on the vertical axis caused by this tilt be opposed and
reduced in any way, the axle will fail to keep on the north and will
lag behind the meridian with an easterly deviation. We shall see later
on that the precession about the vertical axis is in some designs of
gyro-compass unavoidably opposed, and that as a consequence these
compasses exhibit a latitude error.

We have thus shown that the effort of the compass to set its axle
parallel with the earth’s polar axis, combined with the action of
gravity on the pendulum weight, is necessary to the compass if the axle
once having found the north is to remain on it, and that this effort
of the axle increases in strength the farther north--or south--the
compass is moved from the equator. What, however, this effort gains in
strength as the angle of latitude increases the effective directive
force on the compass loses. Thus in Fig. 11 the directive force may be
represented as at _f_ by a line parallel with the earth’s polar axis.
This line represents the magnitude of the compass’s effort to set its
axle parallel with the polar axis. The speed of the spinning wheel and
its moment of inertia have not been altered by moving the compass away
from the equator, nor has the angular speed of the compass round the
earth’s axis, for although the compass is moving in a circle of reduced
radius T B, and therefore is travelling with less linear velocity than
at the equator, it is still making one turn per twenty-four hours
round the polar axis of the earth. Thus the three factors fixing the
magnitude of the “directive force” are unaltered. The force _f_ is
thus the same as that exerted on the compass at the equator. It does
not, however, act as before, purely about the vertical axis H J, but
partly about H J and partly about the horizontal axis E F. It may be
regarded as a force applied at the end B of the axle and therefore as
tending to turn the wheel about an imaginary axis _a b_. We may resolve
it into two components _p_ and _q_, _p_ being at right angles to the
axis H J and _q_ at right angles to E F. The component _q_ represents
the magnitude of the upwardly tilting effect applied to the axle by
the rotation of the earth. The component _p_ represents the effective
directive force tending to restore the axle from the deflected position
represented towards the north in the horizontal plane. The angle
between this effective component and the full force _f_ is θ, the
angle of latitude of the station at which the compass is set up. The
effective directive force is thus _f_ cos θ, and therefore diminishes
from the value _f_ at the equator towards zero as the north--or
south--pole is approached.




CHAPTER IV

DAMPING THE VIBRATIONS OF THE GYRO-COMPASS


Reviewing what we have already established, we see that a gyroscopic
system possessing “three degrees of freedom” and having a pendulum
weight fixed below the wheel manifests a tendency in all latitudes
to preserve its axle pointing in the north and south direction, a
“directive force” or restoring moment being developed and applied
to the axle if the north and south position is departed from. The
magnitude of the directive force in any given latitude increases with
the deflection, from zero when the axle is pointing north and south
up to a maximum when it is aligned east and west. At any given angle
of deflection of the axle the magnitude of the directive force varies
with the latitude in which the system is stationed, being zero at the
north or south (true) pole and a maximum at the equator. Finally, at
any given angle of deflection of the axle and in any given latitude the
magnitude of the directive force is determined by (_a_) the speed of
rotation of the earth on its polar axis, (_b_) the speed of rotation of
the spinning wheel on its axle, and (_c_) the mass or moment of inertia
of the spinning wheel.

We have now to consider several important matters affecting the
practical application of the gyroscope-pendulum combination as a
substitute for the magnetic compass. The first practical consideration
which arises naturally in our minds is the question: Can a system be
devised and constructed sufficiently robust to withstand the trials and
knocks of every-day use and yet be sufficiently delicate to respond
to the feeble directive forces on the effect of which its action as
a compass depends? From the table given previously it will have been
noted that in the three chief types of gyro-compass so far developed
the directive forces developed are in two examples greater than the
corresponding directive force applied to the card of a magnetic
compass, while in the third the directive force is materially lower.
Even though they were all considerably greater than the force applied
to the needle of a magnetic compass, some doubt as to their sufficiency
to effect their work would remain, for they have to control sensitive
elements, comprising a spinning wheel, axle, supporting rings, etc.,
weighing anything from 7 lb. to about a hundredweight, whereas in the
ordinary compass the sensitive element consisting of the card and its
attached magnetic needles weighs round about ¼ oz. The actual weights
of the sensitive elements are given in the following table.


_Weight of Sensitive Element._

  Anschütz compass               15 lb.
  Sperry compass                100 lb.
  Brown compass                   7¼ lb.
  Thomson magnetic compass      178 grains

Whether or not the directive force developed will be sufficient to
control the movement of the sensitive element in a gyro-compass must
clearly depend very largely upon the degree of success reached in
banishing friction from the vertical axis about which the sensitive
element moves. Without for the present describing the means actually
adopted to secure virtually frictionless support in the three types of
gyro-compass, we may say that were they other than very refined no
compass action whatever would be manifested. In the early theoretical
days of the gyro-compass before sufficiently refined practical
constructive methods had been developed, the experimental verification
of the mathematical results arrived at could not be attempted.

Granted the attainment in practice of a satisfactory frictionless
method of supporting the sensitive element, we have next to note that
the simple gyro-pendulum system which we have been considering would
be quite useless as a direction-finding device either at sea or on
land by virtue of the fact that the very absence of friction at the
vertical axis would encourage the sensitive element to oscillate
from side to side of the meridian under the least provocation. The
period of oscillation would be a prolonged one, much too prolonged, in
fact, to permit the true north to be determined by taking the mean of
the extreme positions reached by the gyro-axle in the course of its
oscillation.

We have seen that the simple gyro-pendulum system which we have so far
been considering, when placed on the equator, manifests a tendency to
set its axle north and south, that if the axle is deflected towards the
east a westerly turning directive force is developed, and that if the
axle is deflected towards the west an easterly turning directive force
is developed.

In an ordinary vertical pendulum (Fig. 13), the resting position of
the bob is at _d_. If it is swung to the position _e_--towards the
east, let us say--the weight _w_ of the bob supplies a moment about the
axis at _g_, tending to restore the pendulum to its resting position;
while if it is swung towards the position _f_--towards the west, we may
suppose--the moment is reversed and again acts to restore the pendulum
to its resting position.

[Illustration: FIG. 13. Pendulum and Compass.]

The gyro-pendulum system as set up at the equator is, it will be
seen, subjected to an exactly analogous set of forces when its axle
is deflected east or west. The system, in fact, constitutes virtually
a horizontal pendulum, the vertical axis H J being identified with
the axis at _g_ in the ordinary pendulum. Now we know that if we
deflect an ordinary pendulum to some such position as _e_ and let it
go it will swing through the resting position _d_ to a position _f_
equidistant on the other side, and will continue to vibrate until
friction at the axis _g_, air resistance, etc., sap its original stock
of energy communicated to it by the initial deflection. The period of
vibration--the time elapsing between two successive passages of the bob
in the same direction through the resting position--is determined by
the length of the pendulum and remains constant throughout, even when
the amplitude of the swing has fallen off virtually to nothing.

An exactly analogous state of affairs exists with the gyro-pendulum
system. If the axle is deflected towards the east and then let go
it will swing back under the action of the directive or restoring
force through the north and south position over to an equal angle on
the western side, and will thereafter vibrate back and forth with a
constant period, until frictional and other losses cause the motion
to die away. The period of vibration is determined by a complication
of factors, among which are the speed at which the wheel is spinning
on its axle, the speed of rotation of the earth, and the mass of
the sensitive element. If the sensitive element can be regarded as
consisting solely of the wheel, then, no matter what may be the size
of the wheel, so long as it is in the form of a circular disc, the
period of vibration is determined solely by the speed of the wheel
and the speed of rotation of the earth. For a wheel at the equator
running at 20,000 revolutions per minute the period of vibration would
be about eleven seconds. In practice, however, the weight of the
axle, the inner and outer supporting rings--or their equivalents--the
pendulum bob and various other fittings and adjuncts of a secondary
nature have to be added to the weight of the wheel in assessing the
influence of the sensitive element upon the period of vibration. The
greater the mass--or more correctly, the moment of inertia--of the
sensitive element the longer will be the period of vibration. In the
early--1910--Anschütz gyro-compass the sensitive element had a moment
of inertia such that the period of vibration at the equator was just
over 61 minutes; that is to say, 334 times as long as it would have
been if the sensitive element had consisted of nothing but the spinning
wheel.

This very prolonged period, were nothing done to rectify matters, would
be a very serious objection in practice to the use of the gyro-compass.
The axle, if deflected, would take about half an hour to reach an
equal position on the opposite side of the meridian. Hence, if, when
a compass reading was desired, the axle were found to be vibrating,
at least half an hour would be required to determine the north and
south direction by observing the two extreme positions of the axle and
taking the mean. The alternative would be to wait until the vibration
died away. This course would involve, however, a very much greater
delay, for the virtual absence of friction at the vertical axis of the
system--an essential, as we have seen, if the directive force is to
be allowed to come into play at all--results in the vibration being
practically unchecked, so that, once started, it would continue almost
indefinitely.

Some means of damping the vibration analogous to the damping action of
the liquid in a magnetic compass must clearly then be provided. Ideally
the means should be such that if the axle is deflected through any
angle it will return to the north and south position in a “dead-beat”
manner and not swing across the meridian over to the opposite side.
This ideal cannot be realised in practice.

Returning to the simple pendulum illustrated in Fig. 13 we have to
notice that the influence at work causing the vibration is the weight
of the bob acting about the axis at _g_. This influence is a maximum
when the bob is at the extreme positions _e f_ and is zero when the
bob is at _d_. On the other hand, the velocity of the bob is zero at
the two extreme positions _e f_ and is a maximum at _d_. During the
swing from _e_ to _d_ the vibrating influence is helping the motion of
the bob and the velocity consequently increases. At _d_ the vibrating
influence disappears, while during the swing from _d_ to _f_ it
reappears and this time opposes the motion of the bob, the velocity of
which consequently becomes less and less. The movement of the bob from
_d_ to _f_ in opposition to the vibrating influence is achieved by the
momentum of the bob arising from the velocity which it gathers during
its swing from _e_ to _d_. For the angle _d g f_ to be equal to the
angle _d g e_ the velocity of the bob as it passes through the position
_d_ must just be a certain amount, no more and no less, namely, the
velocity which a body would acquire in falling from rest at the level
of the bob at _e_ vertically downwards to the level of the bob at _d_.
If the velocity of the bob when it swings through _d_ is greater than
this amount the bob will swing beyond the position _f_. If it is less
the bob will fail to reach _f_.

[Illustration: FIG. 14. Damped and Undamped Vibrations.]

The analogue of the problem to be solved in connection with the
gyro-compass is to devise some means that will rob the pendulum bob on
each successive swing of some percentage of the velocity with which it
passed through the resting position _d_ during the preceding swing. By
so doing we shall obviously decrease continuously the angle to which
the pendulum swings on each side of the position _d_. Thus instead of
the swings as traced out on a piece of paper moving below the bob being
as shown at A (Fig. 14), they will be of the form represented at B.
The amplitudes, instead of remaining of uniform amount practically
indefinitely, will diminish with each swing until they become so small
as to be invisible. It is to be noted that theoretically the vibrations
cannot be completely suppressed even after an indefinite number of
swings, for if the velocity at the resting position is at each swing,
say, 50 per cent. less than at the previous passage, it will always be
something and never become zero. It will, however, in quite a small
number of swings become so low that the motion of the pendulum will
be practically undiscernible. Thus with a 50 per cent. decrement the
velocity at the eighth passage of the bob through the resting position
will be less than 1 per cent. of what it was at the first passage.

It is also to be noted that while the amplitudes are decreased in the
manner indicated the periods of the swings are not being made less. In
an ordinary pendulum the period, as we have said, depends solely upon
the length and--within quite wide limits at least--remains the same
whatever be the angle to which we originally deflect the bob. We should
therefore expect that if the swings are “damped” in the way shown at
B (Fig. 14), the period of each swing would be the same and equal to
that of the undamped swings represented at A. Actually the period of
a damped vibration is always somewhat greater than that of the same
system vibrating freely, for by robbing the pendulum of some of its
velocity at each swing we are virtually causing the bob to pass through
the resting position with the velocity of a free swinging pendulum of
greater length and therefore of increased period. The increase in the
period of the damped pendulum over the same pendulum when undamped is
determined by the strength of the damping means employed, or, in other
words, by the percentage by which we reduce the velocity at each swing.

In the early (1910) Anschütz compass the period of vibration at the
equator without damping was, as we have stated already, about 61
minutes. With its damping device in action the period of the compass
at the equator became approximately 70 minutes. In later designs of
gyro-compasses the period of the damped vibration is deliberately made
85 minutes or thereabouts. A practical advantage--to be explained
later--is secured by adopting this particular value. It is the period
which a simple pendulum would have if its length were equal to the
radius of the earth--4000 miles or so.

[Illustration: FIG. 15. Damped Pendulum.]

A vibrating pendulum (Fig. 15) will be satisfactorily damped if we can
apply to the bob in all positions of its swing a force proportional to
the velocity with which the bob is moving at each given instant and
directed always so as to oppose the motion. At _e_, the position of
release after deflection, the bob has no velocity; the damping force
should therefore be zero. As it travels from _e_ to _d_ the bob is
gaining velocity; the damping force should therefore grow from zero to
a maximum at _d_ and be directed at each instant tangentially to the
curve of swing and act from _d_ towards _e_. During this portion of
its swing the bob is thus robbed of some of its velocity, so that it
fails to rise to the position _f_ and comes to rest at some point _g_.
In travelling from _d_ to _g_ the velocity of the bob is decreasing
naturally, and is still further decreased by the damping force which,
acting in the same direction as before, falls from a maximum at _d_
to zero at _g_. As it moves from _g_ to _d_ on the return stroke the
bob gains velocity; the damping force should therefore increase from
zero at _g_ to a maximum at _d_--of a lower value than the maximum at
the same point during the first stroke--and should be directed along
the curve in the reversed sense, namely, from _d_ towards _g_. During
the swing from _d_ to _h_ the damping force, still reversed, should
decrease from the second maximum value once more to zero. At the start
of the second swing the damping force should again act from _d_ towards
_e_ and should rise from zero to a third maximum value at _d_--less
than either the second or first maximum value, and so on until the
amplitude of the swing is reduced to the required degree. It will be
noticed that in a damped vibration the mean position of the bob on any
one swing is not coincident with the resting position _d_, but lies
somewhere between the resting position and the position from which the
bob commences the swing.

With each passage of the bob through the resting position _d_ the value
of the damping force rises to a maximum, the value of which becomes
less and less on each successive swing. Ultimately, when the bob
settles in the resting position, the maximum value becomes zero. In
other words, the damping force, having completed its work by bringing
the bob to rest, entirely disappears and leaves the pendulum exactly in
the same condition as it would be under in the resting position if no
damping force had ever been in action. The pendulum is thus as free as
formerly to respond, in the resting position, to a vibrating influence,
but as soon as it acquires motion the damping force is again called
into existence to a degree directly dependent on the strength of the
vibrating influence, with the result that the motion is first checked,
and then finally stopped.

The damping force required is, as we have said, one which at all
times is proportional in magnitude to the velocity of the bob--or
what is the same thing, to the angular velocity of the pendulum as a
whole--and which at all times acts to oppose the motion of the bob.
Metallic friction--say, at the supporting axis of the pendulum--it
would bring the motion to rest sooner or later, would not provide a
satisfactory damping force, for solid friction is independent of the
rubbing velocity, at least at low speeds such as we are here concerned
with. The damping force provided by it being constant, would not be
automatically adjusted to the velocity of the bob. It would vanish,
it is true, when the bob was at rest, but as soon as the slightest
vibration set in it would spring up to its full value straight away and
would preserve the same value throughout a large swing as throughout
a small one. In any event the presence of metallic or other solid
friction at the point in the gyro-compass corresponding to the axis of
the pendulum--namely, at the bearings of the vertical axis H J--cannot
be permitted, and must be eliminated to the utmost possible degree if
the directive force is to be sufficient to control the movement of the
sensitive element.

Fluid friction, on the other hand, would provide a satisfactory damping
force, for fluid friction is proportional to the velocity, at least
at low speeds. A pendulum vibrating with its bob in a vessel of water
or the floating card of an ordinary magnetic compass is satisfactorily
damped by fluid friction. In the gyro-compass, however, the motion to
be damped is, as we have seen, an exceedingly slow one, slower in fact
than the small hand of a watch if the deflection of the axle from the
meridian is initially less than 11½ deg. east or west. A fluid damping
force would be proportionately low, so that without making the damping
elements of enormous size the force derived would be insignificant and
next to useless for practical purposes. As an illustration of this
statement it may be remarked that in the early Anschütz compass the
sensitive element was virtually floated in a bowl of mercury. Yet the
drag of the mercury, the velocity of the vibration being so small,
did not measurably reduce the amplitudes of the vibration during
observation extending over several hours. This example is not quite a
good one, however, for the friction at the surface of a body immersed
in mercury would appear to be not of the fluid description, but of the
solid type.

Solid and fluid friction being thus ruled out, at least as direct means
of providing the required damping force, we have to find some other
method of applying it. It is, or should be, clear that in whatever way
the damping force is applied it should originate within the sensitive
element itself. If it originates outside, then its transmission to the
sensitive element cannot, in view of the fact that its origination,
growth, and decay are to be controlled by the motion of the element,
be effected in any conceivable way without the introduction of some
material connection between the element and the outside source of the
force. Such a connection can only be made frictionless if the outside
source moves in exact unison with the sensitive element. If it does so
move it clearly ceases to be an outside source and becomes really part
of the sensitive element itself. This consideration suggests generating
and applying the damping force gyroscopically by the exertion of some
suitable action on the spinning wheel itself.




CHAPTER V

THE DAMPING SYSTEM OF THE ANSCHÜTZ (1910) COMPASS


In the preceding chapter we demonstrated the necessity for damping the
horizontal oscillatory movement of the gyro-compass axle and discussed
the nature of damped vibrations in general. We now turn to describe the
damping means provided in each of the practical forms of gyro-compass
so far evolved.

Turning to the early (1910) form of Anschütz compass, we find that, as
shown in the purely diagrammatic sketch given in Fig. 16, the spinning
wheel is enclosed within a metallic case formed with tubular journals
B C for the axle, and provided with trunnions E F, whereby it is
supported within the vertical ring, which, as before, is free to turn
on a vertical axis H J. The casing, it will be seen is, so far as the
support of the wheel is concerned, exactly equivalent to the horizontal
inner ring of our preceding illustrations. In the actual instrument
the method of supporting the casing so as to permit it to turn about a
horizontal and a vertical axis is not in the least like that shown in
our sketch.

The wheel, running at 20,000 revolutions per minute, although it
is quite plain, has a powerful blower-like action. On one side of
the casing an orifice D is formed for the inlet of air, and on the
periphery below an outlet duct K, directing the air blast tangentially
away from the casing, is provided. The exact value of the pressure of
the blast in the early Anschütz compass is not known to us, but in the
Brown compass, wherein a similar blast is developed, the wheel, running
at 15,000 revolutions per minute, gives an air pressure equal to some 3
in. of water.

[Illustration: FIG. 16. Air Blast Damping System of Anschütz (1910)
Compass.]

The mouth of the outlet duct K is partially closed by a plate L fixed
at the end of a pendulum arm suspended frictionlessly, or practically
so, from some convenient point on the casing, so that when the casing
turns on the vertical axis H J the arm and plate turn with it. The
pendulum arm is carefully balanced in such a way that when the axle
of the spinning wheel is horizontal the plate L exactly divides the
orifice K, leaving equal passages for the air blast on each side. In
this condition the two passages M N being equal in area, the air blast
is divided by the plate into two streams of equal volume and momentum,
so that if their free discharge is not influenced by surrounding
objects their reactions on the casing, one on the one side of the
vertical axis H J, the other on the opposite side, will be equal.

Let the compass be deflected until its axle points east and west, the
end B being towards the east. Then, as we have seen, the tendency of
the axle to remain parallel with its original position, combined with
the rotation of the earth, will cause the axle to assume an inclined
position relatively to the earth’s horizontal surface. Gravity acting
on the pendulous weight S as thus displaced from the plumb line will,
as we know, set up a precession about the vertical axis H J, so as
to cause the end B of the axle to move towards the north. When,
however, the axle tilts in this manner about the horizontal axis E F,
the pendulum plate L, hanging freely, remains in the plumb line.
Consequently the equal areas M N become unequal, as at P Q, the larger
P being towards that end of the axle which has tilted upwards, namely,
the north-seeking end B. The reaction on the casing of the portion of
the air blast issuing from P is now greater than that of the portion
emitted through Q. This inequality results in the application to the
sensitive element of a force acting about the vertical axis H J. The
reaction of a jet of air or water or other fluid being opposed to the
direction in which the jet is issuing, the force applied to the casing
is such as to drive P into the plane of the paper and to bring Q out of
it--that is to say, to tend to rotate the casing on the vertical axis
in the direction of the arrow R.

The force thus applied clearly tends to oppose the return of the
axle from the east towards the north. On the other hand, if the axle
succeeds in turning round until the end B points to the west, the
rotation of the earth will result in the axle tilting as before, but
with the end B downwards. Consequently the area M diminishes and the
area N increases, and the reaction applied to the casing is such as
to tend to turn it in the reverse direction to R. The applied force
in this case therefore opposes the return of the axle from the west
towards the north. The exact manner in which the opposition acts is to
be noted. A force applied to a simple gyroscope, so as to tend to make
it turn about the vertical axis H J in the direction R (Fig. 16) will,
as was stated in our second chapter, cause the wheel to precess about
the horizontal axis E F, the end B of the axle going down and the end
C up. If the force about H J is reversed, the movement produced will
be a precession of the wheel on E F such that the end B of the axle
rises and the end C falls. The opposition between the moment applied
to the sensitive element by the air blast and the moment applied to it
by the directive force is therefore not quite direct. When the end B
of the axle is deflected towards the east a directive force is called
into being by virtue of the tendency of this end to rise. The air blast
reaction about H J induces precession on the axis E F, causing the
end B to fall. By the amount by which the air blast reaction succeeds
in lowering the end B of the axle, by that amount will it reduce the
normal magnitude of the directive force. When the axle swings through
the meridian towards the west a reversed directive force is called into
play by virtue of the tendency of the end B to fall. The opposition of
the air blast reaction arises from the fact that its tendency now is to
make the end B rise. Thus on both sides of the meridian the opposition
of the air blast reaction is effective because it tends to precess the
wheel on the axis E F in the direction opposed to that in which the
rotation of the earth is trying to tilt the axle. The tilt moves the
pendulous weight S away from the vertical, so producing the directive
force; the air blast reaction reduces the tilt and so opposes the
directive force.

The reaction applied to the sensitive element by the air blast thus
fulfils one requirement of a satisfactory damping force; its effect at
all times is opposed in direction to the direction in which the axle
is moving. The second requirement is that the magnitude of its effect
should always be proportional to the velocity with which the axle is
moving.

In connection with this second requirement it is assumed that the
momenta of the air jets issuing from the openings P Q (Fig. 16) are at
all angles of tilt equivalent to the momentum of a single jet issuing
from an imaginary orifice U situated at some distance _d_ from the axis
H J on the side of the larger opening P, the area of the imaginary
orifice R and the velocity of the air through it being constant at all
angles of tilt. If this assumption is correct, then the moment about
H J applied by the reaction of the air blast is proportional to the
distance _d_--that is to say, to the angle of the tilt.

The assumption here made is, we believe, substantially justified if
the angle of tilt is never very great. In actual practice it is always
small. Various considerations, however, suggest that the reactions
of the two jets P Q are not equivalent strictly to the reaction of a
single jet through an orifice R of constant area. Thus from geometrical
considerations we can show that the sum of the areas P Q is not equal
to the sum of the areas M N. Again, the total weight of air drawn in
per minute through the orifice D may be constant, and therefore the
total weight of air delivered per minute through the combined openings
P Q may be unaffected by the tilt. But the ratio in which the total
volume divides itself between the two openings P Q and the velocity
through each certainly vary with the tilt. A peculiar practical
phenomenon also has to be considered in this connection. In the 1910
form of Anschütz compass the peripheral speed of the spinning wheel
was 500 ft. per second, or 340 miles an hour. The air friction at
this speed was so very great that after the wheel had been run a few
thousand hours its surface was found to be noticeably smoother than it
was when the wheel left the grinding machine on which it was finished.
As a result of this polishing effect, we should expect that even though
the speed of the wheel remained perfectly constant, its blower-like
action would decrease somewhat until the compass had been in use for
a certain length of time. If the blower action does so decrease the
magnitude of the air blast reaction on the sensitive element at any
given angle of tilt must diminish with time. We do not know whether the
diminution would be sufficiently great to introduce a serious error in
the reading of the compass.

Taking the assumption to be correct, at least for small angles of tilt,
we have next to study how the angle of tilt varies as the axle swings
from the east side of the meridian over to the west and back again.

When the axle is pointed due east the rotation of the earth, as we have
seen, tends to make the end B rise. If it is pointed due west, the
end B tends to fall. If it is lying dead on the meridian, the earth’s
rotation has no tilting effect at all on the axle. If the axle is
pointed in some direction between due east and due north, the tilting
effect is less than it would be if it were pointed due east, but it
is in the same direction; the end B tends to rise. Similarly, in any
position in the north-west quadrant the end B tends to tilt downwards
under a tilting influence which is somewhat less than that experienced
in the due west position. Let, then, the axle be turned to point due
east. The end B begins at once to rise, but immediately the axle thus
leaves the horizontal position it begins to feel the directive force,
and it commences to turn towards the north. Until it reaches the north
the tilting influence of the earth’s rotation continues so that during
the whole time the axle is swinging through the north-east quadrant the
tilt is increasing and the end B is rising, higher and higher. When the
north direction is reached the tilting influence vanishes and the end
B of the axle tends to travel horizontally in its elevated position
over into the north-west quadrant under the influence of the momentum
acquired in that direction during its movement through the north-east
quadrant. But on passing to the west side of the meridian it again
comes under the tilting influence of the earth’s rotation, which this
time tends to make the end B fall. When the axle reaches the due west
position, the tilting influence being equal to that acting over the
north-east quadrant and reversed in direction, and having acted for the
same length of time, will just have wiped out the elevation of the end
B, and the axle will again be horizontal. On the return journey through
the north-west quadrant the tilting influence is still reversed, so
that on reaching the north position again the end B is as far below the
horizontal as it was above it on the swing from east to west. Passing
to the east side of the meridian, the tilting action assumes its former
direction, the end B begins to rise, and when the due east position is
reached again the axle is once more horizontal. The path traced out
by the end B during a complete vibration from east to west and back
again is thus in the nature of an ellipse--or, in extreme cases, a
circle--such as that shown at _a b c d e_ in Fig. 17.

[Illustration: FIG. 17. Free and Damped Motion of Axle.]

On an east-to-west swing, then, the end B of the axle in Fig. 16, if
the air blast is out of action, tilts upwards from zero to a maximum
in the mid position and then again falls to zero. If the air blast is
brought into play, the reaction, being, as we have seen--at least for
all small angles of tilt--proportional to the angle of tilt of the
axle, will correspondingly increase from zero to a maximum and again
fall to zero. On the west-to-east swing the reaction will similarly
rise and fall in the reversed direction. The unrestrained movement
of the sensitive element under the influence of the directive force
is, as we know, analogous to that of a simple pendulum, so that the
velocity with which the axle moves is zero in the extreme positions
and a maximum in the mid position. Thus we see that the air blast
reaction not only constantly opposes the movement of the axle, with
the variation in the velocity with which the axle moves. The air
blast reaction therefore completely fulfils the requirements of a
satisfactory damping force. When it is brought into play the end B
of the axle, instead of vibrating indefinitely in a closed elliptical
path _a b ... e_ (Fig. 17) moves spirally, as indicated at _f g h_ ...,
until in a relatively short period of time it comes virtually to rest
at _m_ pointing towards the north.

[Illustration: FIG. 18. Damping Curve from Anschütz (1910) Compass.]

An actual curve taken from an Anschütz (1910) compass while it was
settling down on the meridian after the gyro-axle had been deflected
nearly 45 deg. to one side is given in Fig. 18. The crests A B C occur
at 70-minute intervals--the period of vibration of the system when
damped, as we have already stated. The oscillations are, it will be
seen, damped down very effectively, being entirely eliminated in less
than three hours in the course of the third complete vibration. It
follows that if the wheel of a gyro-compass is started spinning with
the axle pointing elsewhere than due north, several hours must be
allowed to elapse before readings are taken from the card. During the
period of settling down, and especially during the later portions, the
movement of the axle towards its resting position is extremely slow,
and cannot be detected by direct observation. It can, however, be
inferred from the readings of a spirit level placed on the card, for,
as we have seen, the oscillations are accompanied by a tilting of the
wheel case on its horizontal axis.




CHAPTER VI

THE DAMPING SYSTEM OF THE SPERRY COMPASS


In the Sperry gyro-compass the damping system adopted is mechanically
of a very different nature from that used in the early Anschütz,
although the theoretical principle of action in both cases is the same.
The Sperry method rules out the employment of air or other fluid in any
shape or form as a means of generating, applying, or transmitting the
damping force, the reason being that if air or other fluid is relied
upon, the damping force--or so the Sperry Company holds--will not act
in strict unison with the oscillations, but will invariably lag behind.

The details of the Sperry method are indicated in a diagrammatic manner
in Fig. 19. As in the Anschütz compass, the spinning wheel revolves
in a casing which, being provided with trunnions E F, takes the place
of the inner horizontal supporting ring of our elementary gyroscope.
Since no blowing action is required of the wheel in this compass the
casing, in order to reduce the expenditure of power required to drive
the wheel, is exhausted of air until a vacuum of not less than 26 in.
is registered on a gauge which forms a permanent fixture on the casing.
The exhaustion is effected by attaching a hand-operated vacuum pump to
a nipple on the casing. The vacuum produced at one exhaustion remains
effective for at least a month under proper treatment. That it is very
well worth while exhausting the casing, if the general design of the
compass permits it, is shown by the fact that in the 1910 Anschütz
compass over 95 per cent. of the work done by the motor driving the
spinning wheel was spent against windage and air friction.

[Illustration: FIG. 19. Damping System of Sperry Compass.]

The outer ring G (Fig. 19) within which the casing is carried is, as
before, mounted on a vertical axis H J. A second outer ring K--or
“phantom ring,” as it is called--surrounds the ring G, and is mounted
co-axially with it. While the ring G, as before, moves along with the
wheel and its casing relatively to the square frame under the influence
of the directive force, the ring K is caused to follow it up in exact
agreement by means of a small electric motor, the pinion of which
engages with a gear wheel L on the upper trunnion, the current to the
motor being automatically controlled by the movement of the ring G.
The compass card may be regarded as attached directly to the top face
of the gear wheel. A second pinion gearing with the wheel L can be
arranged to transmit the reading of the card to any number of repeater
compasses stationed elsewhere.

In all our preceding illustrations we have shown the pendulous weight S
as being attached by a stirrup directly on to the inner horizontal ring
or its equivalent, the wheel casing, so as to move in rigid connection
therewith. In the early Anschütz compass the design definitely
reproduces this arrangement, but in the Sperry compass matters are
otherwise. The pendulous weight S (Fig. 19) is carried on a stirrup,
which is forked at each end so as to span the rings G K, and which is
free to swing on pivots M N fixed on the phantom ring K. The pivots M N
are exactly in line with the pivots E F, and as the phantom ring K and
the ring G always move in unison, the two sets of pivots remain at all
times collinear.

So far the arrangement of parts is exactly similar to that which would
be obtained in our simple gyro-pendulum system if the stirrup of
the pendulous weight were not fixed rigidly to the inner horizontal
ring, but were swung freely on the pivots E F. It can be brought
into complete identity with the arrangement of our simple system if
the pendulous weight S (Fig. 19) or “bail,” as it is called by the
makers, be provided with a pin at its mid point to engage with a hole
in the periphery of the casing. The system, as thus arranged, would
merely be a distinctly complicated mechanical variation of our simple
gyro-pendulum arrangement, and, as a compass, would be open to the same
practical objection, namely, the persistence with which any oscillation
of the axle, once set up, would continue. The vibrations would, in
fact, be quite undamped.

The generation and application of a satisfactory damping force is
accomplished in a very simple, yet beautiful and really ingenious,
manner by displacing the pin connecting the bail and the casing from
the mid position to some position lying eastwards of the vertical axis
H J, as shown at Q.

[Illustration: FIG. 20. Action of Excentric Pin in Sperry Compass.]

In order to follow the action of this arrangement, let us consider a
disc (Fig. 20) swung on a horizontal axis E F on which there is also
swung a weighted stirrup S, the stirrup and disc being connected by a
pin Q. Let this system of parts be held horizontal, and in the first
instance let the pin, as shown in the upper view, be arranged on the
centre line of the disc. Then the weight W of the stirrup applies to
the disc three forces, namely, a force W + _w_ acting downwards at the
end of the pin, and two upward forces P equal to each other at the
pivots E F, as will readily be seen by considering the stirrup as a
lever fulcrumed at the disc end of the pin. The only force tending to
turn the disc is the force W + _w_ acting about the axis E F.

Let, now, the pin be situated excentrically relatively to the axis H J
of the disc, as shown in the lower view. The forces applied to the disc
by the weight W of the stirrup are again three in number. The force
applied at the end of the pin is, as before, W + _w_, but at the pivot
E the force applied falls to P - _p_, while the force at the pivot
F rises to P + _p_. These forces apply turning moments to the disc.
About the axis E F the turning moment, as before, is that of the force
W + _w_. This force, owing to the displacement of the pin, has now, in
addition, a turning moment about the axis H J in the direction of the
arrow R. The upward force P - _p_ on the pivot E tends to turn the disc
in the same direction, while the force P + _p_ on the pivot F tends to
turn it in the opposed direction. These three turning moments about the
axis H J exactly balance each other, as can be confirmed by working out
their values. Thus there is no net alteration produced by shifting the
pin from its central position, for in all positions of the pin the only
effective moment applied by the weight W to the disc is that of the
force W + _w_ about the axis E F.

Now, in the Sperry system the forces P - _p_ and P + _p_ are not
allowed to act on the trunnions E F of the wheel casing, but are borne
by the phantom ring K (Fig. 19) whence they are transmitted back to
form part of the load on the follow-up motor. Acting on the casing,
therefore, there remains only the force W + _w_. This force exerts a
turning moment about the axis E F strictly equal to that produced by a
directly attached pendulous weight. In addition, it exerts a turning
moment about the axis H J.

[Illustration: FIG. 21. Action of Excentric Pin in Sperry Compass.]

As actually constructed, the wheel casing and bail in the Sperry
compass cannot be placed in the position shown in Fig. 20, for the
forks at the end of the bail permit the bail, and therefore the casing,
to swing only through a small angle from the vertical position. It is
clear, however, that if the parts could be moved into the horizontal
position the moment of the force W + _w_ about the axis H J would be a
maximum, just as in this position the moment of the same force about
the axis E F is a maximum. It is also clear that when the parts are in
the vertical position the force W + _w_ has no turning moment about
either axis. In an intermediate position (Fig. 21) the moment of the
force W + _w_ about the axis E F is proportional to _a c_--that is,
to the component of _a b_ perpendicular to the plane of the casing or
disc--just as it would be if the pin were central or if the bail formed
a rigid part of the casing. The moment of W + _w_ about the axis H J
is likewise proportional to the component _a c_. As the value of the
component _a c_, at least for small angles of swing, is proportional
to the angle of swing θ, the net result of making the pin excentric
and introducing a phantom ring is to apply to the casing when it is
deflected (1) the ordinary moment of the weight W about the axis E F,
and (2) an additional moment about the axis H J. This latter moment
is proportional to the angle of swing θ, and in the position shown
in Fig. 21 tends to turn the casing in the direction of the arrow
R. If the deflection is towards the other side of the axis E F, the
moment applied about H J will clearly tend to rotate the casing in the
opposite direction, as shown at T. Comparing Figs. 21 and 16, it will
be seen that the excentricity of the pin in the Sperry compass secures
exactly the same result as the air blast reaction produces in the
Anschütz compass.

It is to be noted that the excentric pin in the Sperry compass is
displaced towards the east when the axle is resting on the meridian. If
it were displaced towards the west the force applied about the vertical
axis would be reversed in its effect, and would tend to increase the
oscillations of the sensitive element and not to damp them, as is the
intention.




CHAPTER VII

THE DAMPING SYSTEM OF THE BROWN COMPASS


In both the Sperry and the early Anschütz compass the natural
oscillation of the sensitive element about the vertical axis is damped
by applying a retarding moment to the element about this same axis,
the strength of the retarding moment being at all times proportional
to the velocity with which the element is moving in the course of its
vibration. The opposition exercised by the retarding force is not,
however, a direct one. The motion of the sensitive element arises from
the fact that the spinning wheel, the axle, and the pendulous weight
are tilted about the horizontal axis E F. The retarding force is
applied about the vertical axis, not because that is the axis on which
the sensitive element is oscillating, but because a force so applied
produces a movement about the horizontal axis tending to wipe out the
tilt and so eliminate the cause of the oscillation.

[Illustration: FIG. 22. Gyro-Pendulum with Axle Tilted.]

An alternative method of damping the oscillation is possible. The
effectiveness of the pendulous weight may be damped by virtually
reducing the weight of the pendulum bob instead of reducing the tilt
at which it is acting. In Fig. 22 the wheel of a gyro-pendulum system
is shown tilted. The weight S is trying to turn the wheel on the
horizontal axis E F in the direction R, and as a consequence is causing
precession about the vertical axis H J in the direction T. Instead
of attempting to damp this precession by applying a force about the
vertical axis so as to reduce the tilt, we might virtually reduce the
weight S by applying an upward force W at the end B of the axle, or,
what is the same thing, a downward force V at the other end. Such a
force, if it were acting alone, would tend to turn the wheel in the
direction opposed to that of the arrow R, and would consequently cause
the wheel to process on the vertical axis in the direction opposed
to that of the arrow T. Acting in conjunction with the weight S, the
force W would thus damp the natural motion by endeavouring to produce a
counter precession of the wheel about the vertical axis.

This alternative method of damping the oscillations is adopted in
the Brown gyro-compass. The mechanism of the Brown method is shown
diagrammatically in Fig. 23. The wheel, as in the early Anschütz
compass, runs in an enclosing case, and acts as a blower, developing a
pressure of about 3 in. of water. At each side of the casing a bottle
L, M is attached to the housing of the axle. A pipe N connects the
bottoms of the bottles, while a second pipe P joins their upper ends.
At its mid point the pipe P is interrupted, and a box Q is inserted
in the gap. This box, as shown separately, is open on the underside,
and is provided with a central partition. The air from the casing is
delivered through the hollow trunnion F, and passes upwards into the
box Q from the orifice R.

When the axle is horizontal the air blast entering the box Q is divided
into two equal portions by the central partition, and exerts an
equal pressure inside the bottles. These two bottles are half-filled
with oil, which under the equal air pressures and the horizontal
configuration of the system lies at an equal level in each bottle, and
does not therefore unbalance the sensitive element on the axis E F.
If, however, the axle tilts the balance is disturbed. Thus if the end
B rises the box tilting with the wheel will assume some such position
relatively to the nipple R--which is free of the trunnion F--as that
shown at T. The central partition will divide the air jet unequally,
and a greater pressure will therefore be exerted inside the bottle L
than in the bottle M. Thus the oil level in L falls, while the oil
level in M rises. The difference in the weights of the two bodies
of oil acts as a turning moment tending to rotate the casing about
the horizontal axis E F in the direction U--that is to say, in the
direction opposed to that in which the pendulum weight S is trying to
turn the casing. Since the pendulum weight causes precession about H J
in the direction V, the weight of the unbalanced oil will cause or
tend to cause precession about H J in the reverse direction.

[Illustration: FIG. 23. Damping System of Brown Compass.]

Should the end B of the axle fall, the air jet will exercise excess of
pressure in the bottle M, the oil level will rise in the bottle L, and
as a consequence will tend to make the system precess about H J in the
direction of the arrow V. Thus in both cases the precession which would
be produced by the unbalanced weight of oil if it acted alone is in the
reverse direction to that produced by pendulum weight when the axle
tilts under the rotation of the earth.

As the excess of pressure in either bottle varies with the ratio in
which the central partition of the box Q divides the air blast, and
as that ratio varies with the angle of tilt, it follows that the
opposition of the applied precession increases with the angle of
tilt, and therefore with the rate at which the sensitive element is
turning on H J under the influence of the pendulum weight S. The system
therefore fulfils the requirements of a satisfactory damping method.

It may be noted that were the air blast and the box Q suppressed and
the pipe P made continuous, a tilt of the axle would cause oil to flow
from one bottle to the other in the endeavour of the liquid to preserve
its surface horizontal. This flow might be constricted by means of a
valve in the pipe N, and would then serve to damp the oscillations,
for the arrangement would constitute virtually an oil dashpot. This
plan would not prove satisfactory in practice, because the tilts which
are attained are so small that the amount of oil flowing between
the bottles would be insignificant. Further, the flow would almost
certainly lag behind the movement to be damped. The application of the
air blast to the surface of the oil greatly increases the rate of flow
of the oil and correctly synchronises it with the tilt. The extent
to which the damping effect is allowed to act on the system can be
regulated by means of a needle valve in one of the bottles, which valve
is made to control the orifice in the bottom of the bottle through
which the pipe N enters.

The damping system adopted in the latest form of Anschütz compass
cannot very conveniently be described at this point. It will be dealt
with later on in Chapter XVII. For the present it is sufficient to say
that the system used is in principle very similar to that found in the
Brown compass.




CHAPTER VIII

THE LATITUDE ERROR


Having explained the necessity for damping the horizontal vibrations
of the gyro-compass axle and how the damping force is generated and
applied in the Anschütz, Sperry, and Brown compasses, we are now in
a position to discuss the various errors to which the gyro-compass
is open and how those errors are in practice eliminated, reduced, or
allowed for.

The first error to which we shall turn our attention is that known as
the latitude error. This error is a direct consequence of the necessity
we are under of damping the horizontal vibrations of the compass axle.

It will be recalled that in any latitude other than the equator the
compass rests on the north with a slight tilt up or down of the axle,
the tilt increasing progressively as the poles are approached and being
upwards in northern latitudes and downwards in southern. The tilt
acquired in any latitude is perforce and automatically just sufficient
to precess the axle westwardly or eastwardly at the rate required at
that latitude to keep the axle on the north once it has found it.

Let us suppose, then, that a compass of the early Anschütz type is
stationed in some degree of northern latitude. The axle in acquiring
the appropriate tilt will clearly disturb the equilibrium between
the two sections of the air blast. As the axle tilts its north end
B upwards the north section of the air blast will enlarge and the
southern diminish in area. Thus the tilting of the axle brings into
play an air blast reaction which is applied as a moment tending to
turn the sensitive element about the vertical axis H J in such a way
as to make the north end move eastwardly. The actual movement produced
will, in accordance with the fundamental rule, be a precession of the
axle about the horizontal axis, the end B going down. Thus the tilt
upwards of the axle required for the correct working of the compass is
opposed. It is not allowed to acquire the full value which it should
have, but instead stops at the point at which a balance is struck
between the upward moving tendency of the axle resulting from the
earth’s rotation and the downward moving tendency caused by the uneven
air blast reaction. The westerly precession of the axle about the
vertical axis is now that arising from the reduced angle of tilt, and
is less than the rate required to keep the end B pointing to the north.
The resulting deviation is known as the latitude error. Its magnitude
depends upon the latitude and upon such factors as the speed of the
wheel, its efficiency as a blower and other items incidental to the
particular design of the compass.

In the Sperry compass the latitude error arises from an exactly similar
cause. Thus the tilt of the axle is transmitted through the excentric
pin to the casing as a moment about the vertical axis H J, tending to
make the north end of the axle move over to the east, and therefore
causing the axle to precess vertically downwards until the position of
balance is reached.

In the Brown compass, on the other hand, it is claimed that there is no
latitude error. Thus when in northern latitudes the north end of the
axle tilts upwards under its unsatisfied desire to set itself parallel
with the earth’s polar axis, the air blast is divided unequally between
the two partitions of the box. Excess pressure is exerted inside the
damping bottle attached to the northern face of the wheel casing, and
as a result an excess of oil accumulates in the damping bottle on the
south side. The weight of the excess oil applies a turning moment to
the spinning wheel about the horizontal axis, and tends to lift the
north end of the axle upwards in opposition to the pendulum weight,
which tends to turn it downwards about the same axis. Thus in this
compass the natural tilt of the axle is not interfered with by the
action of the damping arrangement, for that action is applied about the
horizontal axis E F, and not, as in the Anschütz and Sperry compasses,
about the vertical axis H J. The damping action in the Brown compass is
virtually equivalent to a subtraction from the weight of the pendulum
bob, and is not applied, as in the other compasses, to the reduction of
the tilt of the axle. It tends, therefore, to reduce the natural rate
of westerly precession required at the given latitude to keep the axle
on the north. Actually, however, the tilt acquired by the axle will
take cognisance of the reduction in the weight of the bob caused by the
weight of the excess oil. The north end of the axle will rise until the
effective moment of the bob--that is, the moment due to its own actual
weight less the moment due to the excess oil in the southern damping
bottle--is such as will automatically generate the required rate of
westerly precession for the given latitude.

In the Anschütz and Sperry compasses the latitude error can be allowed
for by shifting the position of the lubber line relatively to the
ship’s longitudinal centre line in accordance with calculated tables
of the error. The exact value of the error depends upon the design of
the compass, but in both types it increases with the latitude. Analysis
shows that--at least in the early Anschütz compass--the latitude error
may be neglected if the change of latitude is less than 10 deg. In the
Sperry compass, as we shall see presently, the movement of the lubber
line to correct the latitude error is effected by a very pretty piece
of mechanism, which also can control the position of the lubber line
to allow for a second error to which the compass is open, to wit, the
so-called “north steaming error.”

In some respects as an alternative to moving the lubber line,
the latitude error may be completely eliminated for a particular
latitude--the latitude of most frequent use would naturally be
chosen--by attaching a small weight to the north side of the wheel
casing. In the early Anschütz compass such a weight was provided
as indicated at T in Fig. 16. This weight and its position were so
chosen that at 50 deg. north of the equator its moment about the
horizontal axis E F, when the axle of the compass was horizontal,
was just sufficient to supply to the wheel the amount of westerly
precession required to keep the axle pointing to the north. The axle
being horizontal in that latitude, the air blast was equally divided by
the pendulum shutter, and as a result the rate of westerly precession
produced by the weight T was not affected by the existence of the
damping system. At other latitudes, of course, the latitude error
arose, and at the equator--where ordinarily there should be no latitude
error--and south of the equator, the error became worse than it would
have been without the addition of the weight, unless the weight and
its position were adjusted. With the compass corrected for 50 deg. N.
latitude the error had the following values:

  Latitude       Error
  60° N.          .6° E.
  50° N.         Zero
  40° N.          .5° W.
  20° N.         1.1° W.
   0°            1.6° W.
  20° S.         2.1° W.
  40° S.         2.7° W.
  60° S.         3.8° W.

In the Sperry compass no attempt is made to eliminate the latitude
error at any particular latitude, the correction applied to the lubber
line being solely relied upon to allow for it. In this compass,
therefore, the latitude error is zero at the equator. At 50 deg. north
or south it amounts to 2 deg., easterly and westerly respectively.
A feature found in this type of gyro-compass of a connected nature
calls, however, for mention at this point. This feature consists of
mounting the pivots M N (Fig. 19), on which the bail swings, within
excentric housings and graduating the edge of the housings with a scale
of latitudes. In this way the pivots can be displaced to one side or
the other of the vertical plane containing the axis H J by an amount
proportional to the latitude. When the spinning wheel is at rest, this
displacement makes the angle between the axle of the wheel and the
plumb line through the centre of gravity of the bail a little less
or a little more than a right angle, and in northern latitudes makes
the north end of the axle dip below the horizontal and in southern
latitudes rise above it. The scale is so graduated that the dip of the
axle or its rise when the wheel is not running is just equal to the
natural rise or dip which the axle would acquire at any given latitude
with the wheel running and with the bail pivots in the mean position.
As a result, when the compass is in service and the bail pivots are
adjusted for the latitude of the station, the natural rise or dip of
the axle leaves the axle horizontal, but deflects the bail weight from
the vertical by the amount required to generate the correct degree of
easterly or westerly precession.

Thus in the Sperry compass the axle, if the latitude bail correction
is applied, is at all latitudes horizontal when resting on the north.
Several advantages are thus secured, the chief being that the effect
of any change in the speed of the spinning wheel or of a complete
failure of the electric supply driving the wheel is greatly reduced
or spread over a longer interval. Were the axle as well as the bail
allowed to acquire the rise or dip proper to the latitude, the axle
during a change of speed of the wheel would tend to deviate and develop
an error which might prove misleading. If, however, the axle is not
allowed to acquire the rise or dip appropriate to the latitude, the
error introduced by a change in the speed of the wheel takes longer
to manifest itself, and is reduced in magnitude. As it is difficult
to guarantee that the voltage of the current supplied to the compass
will not vary, this feature of the Sperry compass is undoubtedly of
practical advantage.




CHAPTER IX

THE NORTH STEAMING ERROR


The source of error which we have just discussed affects the
gyro-compass whether it is on land or on a ship. We have now to discuss
certain errors which are only met with when the compass is mounted on
board a moving ship.

The first of these errors to which we will refer is sometimes called
the “north steaming error,” although it is equally associated with
a due south course. Imagine the vessel on which the gyro-compass is
fitted to be sailing due east along the equator. If its speed is,
say, 20 knots it would, if it could, circumnavigate the globe in 45
days. Its velocity round the earth’s axis apart from the rotation
of the earth is thus 0.000015 revolution per minute. As the speed
of the earth on its polar axis is 0.0007 revolution per minute, the
actual rate at which the gyro-axle is being carried round in space is
0.000715 revolution per minute. If the vessel is sailing due west its
speed opposes that of the earth, so that the actual rate at which the
gyro-axle is being carried round in space is 0.000685 revolution per
minute. As compared with the same gyro-compass on land, the only effect
of the ship’s speed on these courses is in the one case to increase the
magnitude of the directive force and in the other case to reduce it,
the increase and reduction both being quite small--about 2 per cent.
actually. Sailing due east or west in latitude 60 deg. north or south,
its speed would cause the vessel to circumnavigate the globe in 22½
days. On these courses in either of these latitudes, therefore, the
directive force would be increased or diminished respectively by about
4 per cent.

[Illustration: FIG. 24. The North Steaming Error at 0 Deg. and 60 Deg.
N.]

If, now, the vessel starts at the equator and sails due north, its
speed is at right angles to the speed with which the rotation of the
earth is carrying the gyro-compass round in space. The speed of the
ship--2026 ft. per minute--may be represented by A B (Fig. 24) and the
speed of rotation of the earth--92,400 ft. per minute--by A C. The
actual speed and direction in which the gyro-compass is being carried
round in space is A D, and the actual axis about which it is being
carried round is not the earth’s polar axis N S, but an axis N´ S´ at
right angles to A D. The gyro-axle will settle, therefore, on the line
N´ S´, and not on the true north and south meridian. The true north
will be to the east of the indicated north by the angle N´ A N, which
for the ship speed in question--20 knots--will be 1.25 deg. If the
ship starting from the equator sails due south, the deviation will be
towards the opposite side, the true north lying 1.25 deg. to the west
of that indicated by the compass. If the course is neither due north or
south nor due east or west, the deviation will have some intermediate
value between zero and 1.25 deg., the true north lying to the east of
the indicated on all courses with a northern component and to the west
on all courses with a southern component.

If the ship is in latitude 60 deg. north, and is steaming north, its
speed will carry it, as before, 2026 ft. northward per minute, as at
E F, but, as its distance from the earth’s polar axis is now only
half what it was at the equator, the earth’s rotation is carrying it
round at only half the equatorial speed, namely, with a velocity E G
of 46,200 ft. per minute. The compass is therefore being carried round
in space with a velocity represented in magnitude and direction by
E H--that is to say, it is being rotated not actually about the earth’s
polar axis N S, but about an axis N´´ S´´ at right angles to the
resultant velocity E H. The axle will therefore align itself parallel
with N´´ S´´, and not with N´ S´. Thus in that latitude at the given
speed the true north will lie 2.5 deg. eastward of that indicated by
the compass. On north-easterly or north-westerly courses at 60 deg.
north latitude the deviation will lie between zero and 2.5 deg., while
on all courses with a southerly component the true north will be to
the west of the indicated north by some amount between the same two
limits. Our demonstration is not strictly accurate, for, arising from
the rotundity of the earth, the speed E F of the ship is not really
in the plane of the paper, but should be drawn inclined with the end
F below the level of E. Accurate analysis, however, shows that the
deviation arrived at by neglecting this fact is substantially correct.
In the tables issued in connection with the early Anschütz compass the
deviation at 20 knots due north or south in latitude 60 deg. N. is
given as 2.5 deg., while those issued by the Sperry Company give it, by
interpolation, as 2.41 deg.

It will be seen that this error is a natural one--that is to say, it is
not caused by any peculiarity in the design of the compass in use. The
table of deviations on various courses, at various speeds, in various
latitudes, compiled for one type of compass would be equally applicable
to any other design. In the case of the early type of Anschütz compass
the “north steaming error” was corrected solely by means of such
tables--that is to say, to find the exact bearing on which the ship
was sailing the compass was read, and from its reading there was
subtracted, or to it there was added, arithmetically, the appropriate
figure taken from the tables, the uncorrected reading being a
sufficiently accurate indication of the true course to permit it to be
assumed as the true course for the purpose of extracting the correction
from the tables.

In the Sperry design the use of similar tables in a similar way is
permissible and is provided for. In addition, however, provision
is made whereby the tables may be entirely dispensed with and the
correction applied by moving the lubber line relatively to the ship’s
fore and aft direction. In the case of the early Anschütz compass the
lubber line could be moved through 4 deg. on each side of the position
in which it was parallel with the ship’s fore and aft centre line.
This movement was, however, for the purpose of correcting the latitude
error, and not the north steaming error. In the Sperry compass
provision is made for moving the lubber line so as to correct for both
errors. The latitude error depends upon the design of the compass and
the latitude. The north steaming error is independent of the design of
the compass, and is determined by the speed of the ship, the latitude
in which it is sailing, and the course which it is following. Latitude
thus comes into both errors, being the sole variable causing one,
and one of the three variables causing the other. It is eliminated
simultaneously for both errors, by operating one dial. A second dial is
set to suit the speed of the ship, while the third factor in the north
steaming error, the bearing of the ship’s course, is automatically
brought into the movement of the lubber line by means of an inclined
ring carried round with the compass card.

A diagram of the Sperry correction mechanism is given in Fig. 25. The
lubber ring on which the lubber line is engraved is shown at A. The
latitude corrector dial B is mounted to rotate about its centre and to
read against a fixed scale. It is slotted radially to engage a pin C
on a rod D E, one end of which can slide in a fixed guide F, while the
other is pivoted to a link E G pinned at H to the lubber ring. If the
end G of this link be imagined pivoted to some fixed point it is clear
that rotation of the dial B will communicate a corresponding rotation
to the lubber ring. The proportions of the parts and the positions of
the pivots and pins are such that by setting the dial to the latitude
in which the vessel is sailing the lubber ring is rotated through the
angle by which the local latitude error causes the gyro-axle to deviate
in its resting position from the true north and south direction.[3]

[Illustration: FIG. 25. Sperry Correction Mechanism for Latitude and
North Steaming Errors.]

If the end G of the link E G were pivoted, as we have supposed it to
be, to some fixed point, then the latitude Error could be applied by
itself to the lubber ring. It is not, however, so fixed, but is pivoted
to a link, the end J of which carries a pin working in a curved slot
extending from the centre of the speed corrector dial K to its edge.
The radius of this curved slot is struck from the point G as centre. It
follows, therefore, that with the speed corrector dial in the position
shown the end J of the link G J may be fixed at any point in the curved
slot without affecting the position of the point G. If, however, the
speed corrector dial be rotated about its centre, the movement of the
point G will vary in magnitude with the position at which the pin J
is fixed in the curved slot. This position is set against the scale
of speed in knots on the edge of the slot, but the setting is without
effect until the speed corrector dial is rotated from the position
shown in the diagram. When it is so rotated a corresponding movement
is communicated to the lubber ring through the link G E, the end E of
which is now to be regarded as the fixed fulcrum.

The two dials B K are connected by means of a link L M of length equal
to the distance between the dial centres. The end L of this link is
pivoted to a fixed point on the dial B, but the end M is provided with
a pin which works within a slot in the dial K. Thus the setting of the
dial B to any latitude will not produce rotation of the dial K, but
will merely cause the pin M to slide in its slot. If, however, the
link M N is moved upwards, the angle through which such movement will
rotate the dial K will depend upon the exact position of the pin M in
its slot--that is to say, upon the setting of the latitude dial. Thus
a movement of the link M N will rotate the lubber ring by an amount
proportional to the movement of M N, to the setting of the pin J in the
curved slot of the speed dial, and to the setting of the latitude dial.

The link M N is pinned to a lever P Q, the end P of which is pivoted
to a fixed point. The end Q carries a roller, which engages within the
flanges of a ring R permanently fixed in an inclined position on the
phantom ring of the compass. The higher end of this ring is situated
directly above the north-seeking end of the gyro-axle, and the lower
end directly above the south-seeking end, its east and west diameter
being aligned horizontally.

In the position shown in the diagram the ship is supposed to be sailing
due west. Under this condition, as we know, no north steaming error is
involved, the latitude error only applying. The dial B can therefore
be set to the latitude in which the vessel is sailing so as to apply
the latitude correction by itself to the lubber ring. At the same time
the pin J can be set to read the ship’s speed--17 knots in the case
shown. The movement of the link J G involved in this setting will,
as we have seen, not alter the setting of the lubber ring, nor will
the setting of the dial B rotate the dial K from the position shown.
The two settings are, however, ready to modify the adjustment of the
lubber ring as soon as any movement of the link M N occurs. Such a
movement arises if the vessel alters course towards the north or south
or intermediately, for when the course is altered the links, dials, and
lubber ring move with the ship, while the compass card and the course
corrector ring R remain stationary. The roller at Q therefore rises
or falls towards the north or south end of the ring, and produces a
rotation of the dial K. The amount of the modification thus produced
in the setting of the lubber ring relatively to the ship’s centre line
will depend upon (1) the setting of the pin M--that is to say, the
setting of the latitude dial; (2) the setting of the pin J on the speed
dial; and (3) the extent of the turn towards the north or south. In
this way the correction for the north steaming error is automatically
added to or subtracted from the correction for the latitude error to
the correct amount on all occasions when the ship’s course is altered
so as to have a northerly or southerly component, the adjustment for
the error being automatically wiped out in all latitudes when the
ship’s course is again brought east and west. The mechanism, it will
be seen, merely by the setting of two dials, takes cognisance of three
independent variables, of which one enters into the required adjustment
in a twofold way.[4] The total correction is indicated on the corrector
scale S attached to the binnacle independently of the lubber ring.

It will be seen, then, that neither the latitude error nor the north
steaming error is in the strict sense of the word eliminated, but is
only allowed for, automatically or arithmetically, when the compass is
read--that is to say, no attempt is made to force the gyro-axle to rest
in the true north and south position in all latitudes at all speeds
on all courses. The crucial angle by which the ship is navigated is
the angle between its longitudinal centre line and the true meridian.
A constant straight course will be held if this angle is maintained
constant. If the indicated meridian on the compass is open to error,
the constancy of the navigating angle may be preserved by introducing
a similar error into the degree of coincidence between the lubber line
and the longitudinal centre line of the ship. The readings of the
master compass may therefore be used for the purpose of maintaining
the ship on a given course or for setting it on a new one. But for
taking the bearing of some passing object, the fact that it may not
be indicating true north may render the observation somewhat more
troublesome than it need be. To overcome the difficulty here involved
the repeaters served by the master compass are arranged to indicate
true north under all conditions, provided the latitude and speed dials
on the master compass are correctly set. The repeaters are operated
electrically, the first element in the transmission system between
them and the master compass being a pinion meshing with the gear wheel
attached to the phantom ring beneath the master compass card. This
pinion is mounted on the lubber ring, and therefore rotates with the
ship round the card when the course is altered. But, as it is mounted
on the lubber ring, it also partakes of the movement of this ring
relatively to the ship produced by the correction mechanism. Thus the
net indication transmitted to the repeaters when the ship changes
course or latitude or speed is compounded of the relative motion of
the master compass card and of the lubber ring. The reading of the
repeaters thus shows the true north. A pelorus or dummy compass may be
combined with the repeaters to facilitate the taking of bearings. In
war vessels the actual navigation of the ship is preferably conducted
from a repeater, the master compass for safety in action being disposed
below the armoured deck.

The Sperry compass is peculiarly complete in the provision made for
taking account of the latitude and north steaming errors. The Brown
compass, as we have seen, is free from latitude error, so that the
north steaming error alone has to be dealt with. This error may be
allowed for arithmetically in the usual way by means of tables of
corrections to be applied to the readings of the master compass. As
regards the repeaters, the error is eliminated by a method involving
the mounting of the repeater cards excentrically, the excentricity
being varied to suit the latitude, speed, and course.




CHAPTER X

THE BALLISTIC DEFLECTION


Having considered the effect of the ship’s speed upon the readings of
the gyro-compass, we have next to discuss the effect of the conditions
which arise when the speed is changed. It is clear, of course, that
if the ship’s speed is changed, say from 20 to 10 knots, the north
steaming error appropriate to the course and latitude will fall to half
its value when the new speed has been attained. Two questions, however,
may be asked. What happens in the period during which the speed is
changing, and what time elapses between the attainment of the new speed
and the attainment by the compass of the new north steaming error
proper to the new speed?

If an ordinary simple pendulum were hung from the roof of a railway
carriage it would be found that so long as the train was travelling
smoothly at _uniform_ speed the pendulum would hang vertically without
oscillating just as it would do if the train were at rest. If the
train increased its speed the inertia of the pendulum--that is to
say, its tendency to go on moving with the old velocity--would cause
the pendulum to assume an inclined position _behind_ the vertical,
the deflection being proportional to the rate at which the train was
gathering speed. At the instant at which the train ceased to gather
speed, and again assumed a uniform velocity, the tendency for the
pendulum to remain inclined to the vertical would vanish, but the
deflection it possessed at that instant would result in its acquiring
an oscillation which would persist until friction, etc., damped it
out. If when the pendulum were again steady and hanging vertically, the
train began to slow down, a similar series of events would occur, only
on that occasion the inertia of the bob would cause the pendulum while
the train was losing speed to assume a _forwardly_ inclined position,
the angle of which would be a measure of the rate at which the speed
was being reduced. On the attainment of the new uniform speed the
pendulum would oscillate for a time, as before.

The gyro-compass is in part a pendulous body, and on a ship changing
speed or acquiring speed from rest or coming to a stop it is open to
the action of inertia forces just as is our railway carriage pendulum.
As a result the compass during the change of speed may exhibit an
error--the ballistic error, as it is called--on top of the existing
north steaming error. Since the speed of a ship, at least of a merchant
ship, cannot be changed very quickly, and since, further, the speed
of a ship, at least on long voyages, is not liable to be changed very
often, it might be thought that this transient ballistic error could
be neglected. It probably could be safely neglected if its effect were
strictly confined to the actual period of the change in the speed, but
it is not so confined. We have to bear in mind the subsequent vibration
of the railway carriage pendulum. A similar oscillation is set up in
the gyro-compass after the new speed is attained. Since the period of
oscillation of the compass is about 85 minutes, and as two or three
complete swings have to be made before the damping arrangements can
suppress the vibration, it follows that the compass will not settle in
its resting position again until two or three hours after the new speed
has been attained, although the actual change of speed may have been
effected inside five minutes or less.

[Illustration: FIG. 26. Ballistic Force on Compass when Ship’s Speed
Changes.]

If the ship is sailing on an east-west course, as represented in Fig.
26, any change of speed will tend to cause the pendulum weight S to
move in the direction R or T, according as the change of speed is a
decrease or an increase. Such a tendency will merely throw stresses on
to the journals at E F and H J, or, if the equivalent of the square
outer frame is carried on gimbals, as it actually is in practice, then
the tendency to rotate will be translated into an actual movement of
the sensitive element on the axis of the outer mounting coincident or
parallel with the axle B C of the wheel. Such a movement will have
no gyroscopic effect on the compass, for the axle is not subjected
by it to any non-parallel displacement. No ballistic deflection will
therefore occur on that course.

[Illustration: FIG. 27. Ballistic Force on Compass when Ship’s Speed
Changes.]

If the ship changes speed while on a west to east course, the change is
similarly without effect on the compass. Strictly speaking, we ought
to say that the change of speed will have no effect on the compass if
the ship’s course is at right angles to the direction in which the axle
of the wheel is pointing. Only at the equator would this course be due
east or west. In other latitudes the latitude error has to be reckoned
with, so that the particular course on which changes of speed are
without effect on the compass must be slightly south or north of due
east or west.

If, now, the ship is steaming due north, as indicated in Fig. 27, a
reduction of its speed will tend to make the pendulum weight swing
forward about the east and west axis E F in the direction P. This
tendency is clearly equivalent to the application of an upward force
to the end B of the axle, and hence, as we know, will cause the wheel
to precess, the end B of the axle going eastwards. As this precession
continues it is opposed by the ever-increasing restoring moment of the
directive force, so that in the end the axle assumes a position in
which the directive force just balances the ballistic deflective force.
This ballistic deflection remains constant all the time the ship’s
speed is falling. When the speed reaches the new steady value the axle
slowly oscillates back to the true resting position.

It is clear that a reduction of speed on a northerly course and an
increase of speed on a southerly produce ballistic deflections in a
like direction, the north end of the axle moving towards the east. An
increase of speed on a northerly course or a decrease of speed on a
southerly produces a westerly ballistic deflection. On intermediate
courses deflections of a like kind, but of intermediate value, are
caused, for the north and south _component_ of the change of speed is
alone effective in tilting the wheel about the east and west axis E F.

Imagine a ship steaming due north at 20 knots and changing its speed
to 10 knots during a period of five minutes. As it is steaming north
there will be a north steaming error, the axle pointing westwards of
true north by an amount dependent upon the speed of the ship and the
latitude in which it is sailing. Let O N (Fig. 28) be the direction
of true north, and let O A be the direction in which the axle of the
gyro-compass aligns itself when the speed is 20 knots, the angle N O A
being the combined latitude and north steaming errors. Let O B be the
resting position for the axle when the ship’s speed is 10 knots, the
angle N O B being the latitude error--which has not altered--plus the
north steaming error--which is now less because of the reduced speed.
As the speed is being reduced, the ballistic action of the pendulum
weight causes the axle temporarily to turn eastwards from the true
resting position and to align itself in some direction O C. When the
ship has settled down to 10 knots, the axle leaving the position O C
vibrates about O B with amplitudes which are being continually reduced
by the action of the damping system.

[Illustration: FIG. 28. Ballistic Deflection.]

The point of importance to notice is that the temporary ballistic
deflection O C is eastward of O A, just as is O B the new resting
position for the axle. This result is a general one. Had the speed been
increased instead of decreased, the ballistic deflection would have
been westward of O A, just as would be the new resting position for the
axle at the increased speed. Similarly, on due southerly courses or on
quadrantal courses the ballistic deflection produced by any change of
speed is always in the same direction as that in which the axle moves
in passing from the old to the new north steaming error. This being
so, it is conceivable that at least, under certain conditions, the
ballistic deflection position O C may coincide with the new position
O B for the axle under the new north steaming error. Should such a
result be obtained, the ballistic action will, on a change of speed
occurring, swing the axle straight away into the new resting position.
Thus O C and O B being coincident, there will be no tendency for the
axle to oscillate about O B when the speed assumes the new steady
value, so that the axle will swing into the new resting position in a
“dead-beat” manner. The effect of the ballistic action will thus be
confined to the period during which the speed is being changed--five
minutes in our example--and will not influence the readings of the
compass for a period of anything up to two or three hours after the new
speed is reached.

The ballistic deflection of a pendulum hung from the roof of a railway
carriage is dependent upon the length of the pendulum, and therefore
upon its period of natural vibration. So, too, the ballistic deflection
of the gyro-compass is dependent upon the period of its vibration about
the north and south direction. Once the characteristics of the compass
are determined, therefore, the angle A O C (Fig. 28) of the ballistic
deflection is settled by (1) the direction of the ship’s course, and
(2) by the rate at which the ship’s speed towards the north or south
is being changed. It is not affected by the latitude in which the
ship is sailing, the deflection produced by a change of 10 knots in
five minutes being the same at the equator as in 60 deg. or any other
latitude.

Coming to the difference between the old and the new north steaming
errors, it will be seen from our previous explanation of the errors
themselves that the magnitude of the angle A O B is independent of
the design of the compass in use. It will vary with (1) the direction
of the ship’s course, and (2) the extent by which the ship’s speed is
changed. In addition, it will also vary with (3) the latitude in which
the ship is sailing.

From these considerations it is argued that by suitably selecting the
period of vibration the ballistic deflection can be made _for one
particular latitude_ just equal to the difference between the north
steaming errors for any initial and any new speed on any course. In
practice the latitude selected is 40 deg. north or south. It is found
by calculation that the period of vibration which must be given to the
compass to secure this dead-beat ballistic deflection is such that in
this latitude the compass should oscillate in the same period as would
a simple pendulum, the length of which was equal to the radius of the
earth. It is for this reason that all modern gyro-compasses have a
period of vibration of approximately 85 minutes.[5]

In latitudes other than 40 deg. north or south the ballistic deflection
will not be dead-beat, but by taking this latitude as the mean the
subsequent oscillation after a change of speed is--in mercantile
vessels at least--sufficiently small to introduce no error of great
importance, except for purposes of very accurate observation, in which
case the observation, if possible, would not be made until the vessel
had been running for two or three hours after the last considerable
change of speed.

It is to be noticed that the ballistic error may arise when the
ship is altering course without altering its speed. Thus, if it is
sailing north and makes a sharp turn eastwards or westwards, the speed
northwards during the turn falls progressively from a maximum at the
beginning to zero at the end of the turn, even although the actual
linear speed of the ship remains constant throughout. Turning in either
direction is thus equivalent to a deceleration of the ship’s northerly
speed, so that an easterly ballistic deflection may be expected in both
cases. On the other hand, a turn towards the north from a due east or
west course is equivalent to an acceleration of the ship’s northerly
speed, and, as a result, a westerly ballistic deflection is produced.
In latitude 40 deg. north or south both these ballistic deflections
would be dead-beat in a modern gyro-compass, being just sufficient in
the one case to eliminate and in the other to apply the appropriate
north steaming error.

In a very recent improvement, it is understood, it has been found
possible to provide means whereby the ballistic deflection is made
dead-beat in _all_ latitudes.




CHAPTER XI

THE QUADRANTAL ERROR


Let a stone be tied to the end of a string and be flung forward while
the free end of the string is held in the hand. Let the hand holding
the free end be moved forward at first with the same speed as the
stone in its flight, and then let the hand be drawn back. We know
that as soon as the string becomes taut--if it were not already fully
extended--the hand would feel a pull exerted on it in the direction
in which the stone was initially projected. This pull arises from
the fact that the stone has been given momentum in the direction of
its flight, and while this momentum is being taken out of it by the
backward pull of the hand and new momentum in the backward direction is
being communicated to it the stone reacts forcibly on the string and
therefore on the hand.

In the gyro-compass the pendulum weight may be likened to the stone,
the stirrup carrying the weight to the string, and the spinning wheel
to the hand. While the ship is steaming at a uniform speed, the system
is in the condition existing just after the stone has been projected
from the hand, and while the hand is following it with equal speed.
A change in the ship’s speed--a reduction of its speed to be quite
correct in our analogy--is comparable with the drawing back of the
hand. The pull of the stone exerted on the hand at this instant is
represented by the tendency of the weight to continue moving at the
former speed, and the resultant “kick” which by its attempt to do so
it applies to the spinning wheel. This kick is communicated to the
spinning wheel through stiff members and rigid connections, and not
through a flexible string. It really acts at the centre of gravity of
the pendulum weight, and is therefore felt by the spinning wheel, not
as a straight pull, but as a force tending to turn the wheel about the
horizontal axis E F.

The kick of the weight when the ship changes speed on any course having
a north or south component produces, as we have seen, a transient
ballistic error which may influence the correctness of the compass
readings for some hours after the change of speed has been completed.
We have now to show that similar kicks occur under other conditions,
and may similarly affect the accuracy of the readings.

The subject which we are about to discuss is the so-called quadrantal
error which, unless steps are taken to eliminate it, appears in the
compass readings when the ship is sailing in a rough sea on any course
other than due north, south, east, or west. It is caused by the rolling
and pitching of the ship. The efforts made to eliminate it have
influenced the evolution of the gyro-compass to a greater extent than
probably those directed towards overcoming or allowing for all the
other errors combined to which the device is open.

[Illustration: FIG. 29. Effect of Rolling on due North Course.]

The gyro-compass on board ship is usually, although in no way
necessarily, mounted above the vessel’s metacentres--transverse and
longitudinal--about which rolling and pitching take place. In Fig.
29 we show a section, looking aft, of a vessel steaming due north
with a gyro-compass mounted on its deck. It is clear that, so far as
the weight S is concerned, it may be regarded when the ship rolls as
the bob of an inverted pendulum vibrating in an east and west plane,
through an angle equal to the angle of the ship’s roll. From what we
have already said, it will be seen that at the end of a roll to port
the hand holding the string attached to the flying stone, hitherto
following it, begins its withdrawal to the east. The weight checked in
its movement to the west communicates a kick to the sensitive element.
This kick, a westward force, is applied at the centre of gravity of
the weight, and clearly does nothing more than throw a stress on to
the journals at E F and H J, and through the square frame on to the
deck. It does not therefore affect the direction in which the gyro-axle
is pointing. If, as is actually the case in practice, the equivalent
of the square frame is not fixed directly to the deck, but is mounted
inside the binnacle on athwartship and longitudinal gimbals, the square
frame will swing on the longitudinal gimbal axis. The weight S will,
however, still act during the ship’s roll as an inverted pendulum,
as at Z Z, in which the bob remains more or less parallel with its
original direction. Under these conditions the kick of the weight at
the end of a roll to port will rotate the frame in the direction of
the curved arrow about the longitudinal gimbal axis. As this axis is
coincident or parallel with the gyro-axle, the gyro-axle is not moved
otherwise than parallel with itself either by the actual roll of the
ship or by the kick of the weight at either out position. Thus a ship
steaming north may roll with impunity without affecting the accuracy of
the direction in which the gyro-axle is pointing.

[Illustration: FIG. 30. Effect of Rolling on due West Course.]

It is clear that rolling on a due south course or _pitching_ on a due
east or west course is similarly without effect on the gyro-compass.

Now consider the case of the ship _rolling_ when on a due west course
(Fig. 30). It is clear that here again the weight S may by itself be
considered as the bob of an inverted pendulum vibrating through the
angle of the ship’s roll, this time in a north and south plane. The
weight S has, in addition, its own pendulum action on the horizontal
axis E F, and tends to keep the gyro-axle horizontal throughout the
roll.

At the end of a roll to port the kick of the weight S, a southerly
force acting at the centre of gravity of the weight, tends to turn the
spinning wheel in the direction R about the horizontal east and west
axis E F. This kick is clearly equivalent to the application of an
upward force at the end C of the axle or a _downward_ force at the end
B, and therefore, as we know, will cause the axle not to turn about
E F, but to precess the north end B towards the _west_ about the axis
H J.

The roll to starboard now takes place, and at its end the kick of the
weight occurs in the northerly direction. This kick will tend to turn
the spinning wheel about the east and west axis E F in the direction T,
and is clearly equivalent to the application of an _upward_ force at
the end B of the axle. Such a force, as we know, will cause the end B
of the axle to precess towards the _east_.

It will thus be seen that the western deflection of the axle produced
by the precession which occurs at the end of the roll to port is
counterbalanced and automatically eliminated by the eastern deflection
produced by the precession occurring at the end of the roll to
starboard. The only effect on the compass caused by the rolling of the
ship is therefore a vibration of the axle about the north and south
direction. We should really say that the only effect is the application
to the sensitive element of a vibratory influence in tune with the
rolling of the ship. As the ship’s period is very small compared with
that of the compass about the axis H J--about 5 to 12 seconds as
compared with about 85 minutes--this vibratory influence practically
fails to disturb the steadiness with which the axle points to the north.

It is clear that pitching of the ship when on a due west course has
the same effect--or lack of effect--on the compass as rolling on a due
north course, and that pitching on a due north course has the same
effect as rolling on a due west course. It is further clear that due
south and due east courses are similar in this respect to due north and
due west courses. Thus when the ship is on a cardinal course neither
pitching nor rolling disturbs the axle of the spinning wheel from its
north resting position.

Matters are quite otherwise, however, when the course is an
inter-cardinal, or quadrantal, one. The discovery of this unlikely fact
was in large part due to the investigations of the Compass Department
of the British Admiralty. It does not appear to have been known, or at
least its full significance does not seem to have been appreciated,
in the earlier days of gyro-compass construction. At least one early
design of compass--the Anschütz of 1910--did not include means of
eliminating or allowing for the “quadrantal error,” and soon became
obsolete as a result primarily of the omission. That the later design
of Anschütz compass successfully overcomes the difficulties introduced
by this error is shown by the admitted excellence of the navigation
of the German submarines, which vessels were universally fitted with
compasses of this design, and which, like all their class, suffer much
from rolling and pitching.

[Illustration: FIG. 31. External Gimbal Mounting.]

So far we have been able to use a very simple model to demonstrate
the properties and errors of the gyro-compass. We have now reached a
subject which, if it is to be explained correctly, requires us to adopt
a model of a more elaborate nature, one in which the outer square frame
of our simple model is itself mounted on a pair of gimbal axes. We
have already referred to this type of mounting in our second chapter
and above in connection with Fig. 29. In Fig. 31 we show it with the
pendulous weight added to the sensitive element. We may take it that
the axis T U, about which the entire compass system may swing, is
parallel with the longitudinal centre line of the ship, and that the
frame Y is fixed to the deck.

[Illustration: FIG. 32. Effect of Rolling on a Due North Course (Simple
Mounting).]

[Illustration: FIG. 33. Effect of Rolling on a Due North Course
(External Gimbal Mounting).]

In order to make quite clear the difference between the two forms of
mounting, we give in Figs. 32 and 33 two corresponding sets of views
showing the compass system on a ship while steaming due north and
rolling. With the simple mounting (Fig. 32) the weight S constantly
remains radially below the centre of the spinning wheel, and the
kicks which it applies at the out port and out starboard positions
merely stress the compass mountings. With the more elaborate mounting
(Fig. 33) the weight tends to remain constantly in the vertical below
the centre of the spinning wheel, but the kicks occurring at the out
positions, if the rolling is continued for any length of time, cause
it to swing beyond the vertical, so that as the ship rolls the whole
compass system acquires an oscillation on the axis T U (Fig. 31) in
tune with the rolls. It is to be noted that the period of vibration of
the compass system about the axis T U is very much less than that of
the sensitive element about the axis H J. The latter, as we have seen,
is about 85 minutes, and is determined, in part at least, by the high
speed of the spinning wheel. About T U the vibration, however, does not
call any gyroscopic force into play, for it takes place without causing
the axle of the spinning wheel to alter its direction. The period of
this vibration is therefore not affected by the speed of the spinning
wheel. It may be quite small--from one to two seconds--and therefore
comparable with the ship’s rolling period. If, then, no steps are taken
to prevent it, the compass system as a whole will acquire a swing on
the axis T U (Fig. 31) when the ship is steaming north--or south--and
rolling. Its period of vibration on this axis is not strictly that
which it would have were it set oscillating about the axis T U with
this axis mounted on a fixed frame, for the vibration is not a free
one, but is a forced vibration under the impulses communicated by the
rolling of the ship. Whatever may be the exact free period of swing of
the compass system on the axis T U, so long as it is somewhere near
that of the ship’s roll or a small sub-multiple of the rolling period,
the tendency is for the compass swings to settle down in such a way
that, as represented in Fig. 33, the pendulum weight S reaches its
extreme out positions simultaneously with the ship’s arrival at its
extreme port and starboard heels. In the course of one complete roll of
the ship, however, the compass system may make more than one complete
vibration about T U.

It is clear that whether the bob S remains radially below the centre
of the wheel, as in Fig. 32, or remains vertically below it, or swings
past the vertical, as in Fig. 33, the effect of rolling when the ship
is on a due north course is as established in connection with Fig. 29.
Either a tendency to rotate the wheel about an axis coincident with its
axle or an actual rotation of the wheel about this axis results from
the kicks of the weight S at the out positions. Whichever it is, there
is no gyroscopic effect called into play, and the axle is not subjected
to any influence causing it to move away from the due north direction.

We have now to discuss what happens if the vessel rolls or pitches when
sailing on an inter-cardinal or quadrantal course.

In Fig. 34 we show in plan a vessel steaming on a north-west course.
When the ship rolls the compass oscillates in the path A D, a path,
that is to say, at right angles to the ship’s centre line and curved
upwardly by reason of the fact that the compass is mounted above the
rolling centre of the ship. The axle of the compass during this
movement tends to point steadily towards the north under the action of
the directive force. The wheel therefore oscillates from A to D with
its axle askew relatively to the path of oscillation, and not at right
angles to it, as in Fig. 29, or parallel with it, as in Fig. 30. The
oscillation A D can, however, be resolved into two components, namely,
a north and south oscillation D K, in which the axle is parallel with
the path, and an east and west oscillation K A, in which it is at right
angles to the path, both paths being curved upwardly.

[Illustration: FIG. 34. Ship Rolling on N.W. Course.]

The oscillation D K, taken by itself, is clearly exactly equivalent to
that shown in Fig. 30. The southward kick of the weight at the “out
position” D (Fig. 34) just neutralises the disturbing effect of the
northward kick at the “out position” K.

Similarly, the oscillation K A, taken by itself, is exactly equivalent
to that shown in Fig. 29 or its modification, Fig. 33. The eastward
kick of the weight at A and the westward kick at K cannot do more than
turn the mounting round the axle of the spinning wheel. They do not
tend to change the direction of the axle.

Hence, taken separately, each component oscillation D K and K A is
without disturbing effect upon the direction in which the axle is
pointing. Taken together, however, their united effect is not the sum
of their separate effects, as we might hastily assume. We must not
suppose that the north and south kicks proper to the north and south
component of the oscillation are without effect upon the east and
west component or vice versa. At the out position D of the component
oscillation K D the weight is not only kicked southwards, but also
receives a westward kick from the other component oscillation A K. At
K it receives both a northward kick and an eastward kick. Similarly,
at the out position K of the component oscillation A K the weight is
kicked not only to the west but also to the south, by virtue of the
oscillation from K to D. At the other out position A of this component
the weight is kicked eastwardly, and also to the north. If we take
cognisance of these additional kicks, we may treat the component
oscillations separately and add the separate results to get the true
effect of the actual oscillation A D.

Returning, then, to Fig. 30, let us suppose that in the oscillation
there shown, the equivalent of the component K D, we apply a westward
kick to the weight S when the ship reaches its port out position--that
is to say, a kick out of the paper--and that at the starboard out
position it receives an eastward kick into the plane of the paper.
It is clear that these additional kicks do nothing more than tend to
rotate the wheel about its axle or an axis coincident or parallel
with its axle. They cannot therefore call any gyroscopic effect into
action, and as a result do not disturb the direction in which the axle
is pointing. The component oscillation D K, even with the extra kicks
added, is thus harmless.

Taking Fig. 33 rather than Fig. 29 as the equivalent of the component
oscillation A K, let us suppose that at the port out position the
weight is subjected to an additional kick to the south--that is,
into the plane of the paper--and that at the starboard out position
it receives an extra kick to the north, or out of the plane of the
paper. The southward kick on the weight at the port out position will
tend to cause the end B of the axle to turn down towards J, but, in
accordance with the fundamental gyroscopic rule, the actual motion
of the sensitive element will not be a rotation about the axis E F,
but a precession about the axis H J, the end B of the axle moving in
the direction K. Similarly, the northward kick at the starboard out
position will tend to cause the end B of the axle to rise towards H,
and will therefore produce precession in the direction L. Now these
two precessional movements, K and L, can be resolved into horizontal
and vertical components N M and Q P respectively, as shown separately,
and of these components it is clear that the movement N cancels the
movement Q. On the other hand, the two components M and P are in the
same direction, and therefore do not cancel each other. Their effect
is cumulative, and with each succeeding roll the end B of the axle
tends to rise higher and higher in the true vertical plane B R. It may
be explained, perhaps, that this motion is possible, in spite of the
fact that there is no actual axis in the mounting of the compass at
right angles to the true vertical plane, except at the instant when
the compass is passing through the even keel position in the course of
its swing from side to side. As the rolling of the ship starting from
zero increases up to a more or less steady value, the end B of the axle
rises slowly at first and then at a constant rate, as exaggerated at
T. Such of this upward movement as occurs while the compass is passing
through the even keel position can be effected by means of a rotary
motion purely about the axis E F. Elsewhere in the swing of the compass
from side to side it is accommodated by a partial rotation on E F and a
partial rotation about H J. These two axes between them permit the end
B of the axle to rise in a vertical plane at any point of the compass
swing just as effectively as would an axis which was at right angles to
the vertical plane B R.

To appreciate the significance of this vertical rise of the north end
B of the axle, let us consider the condition of the compass as it is
passing through the even keel position. The elevation of the end B out
of the horizontal plane causes the weight S to swing forward towards
the north, and therefore to apply a turning moment to the spinning
wheel about the axis E F. This turning moment will tend to bring
the end B down again to the horizontal, but, as we know, the actual
motion produced will be a precession about the axis H J, the end B
moving _westwards_. Looking at Fig. 34, it will thus be seen that the
net effect of the rolling of the ship is to deviate the axle of the
compass in the direction shown at V--that is to say, in the direction
required to set the plane of the spinning wheel parallel with the
plane of the rolling by the shortest possible course--in our example
by a rotation westward through 45 deg. With the axle so deflected
the earth’s rotation, of course, calls a directive force into play,
tending to restore the axle to the north and south line, but if the
ship is rolling violently the deviating force will be much stronger
than the directive force until a very considerable angle of deflection
is reached. When the balance is struck, the axle settles down with a
steady deviation towards the west, which will remain constant as long
as the rolling is maintained. In practice the violence of the rolling
varies almost from roll to roll, for it represents a conflict between
the natural period of rolling of the ship and the period of the waves.
As a consequence, the deviation of the compass varies somewhat during
the rolling, but it is always westwardly if the course is in the
north-west quadrant.

A little consideration will show that if the ship is steaming towards
the north-east the additional kick on the weight S (Fig. 33) at the
port out position will be towards the north and at the starboard
out position towards the south. The end B of the axle is therefore
precessed vertically downwards instead of upwards, and as a result
the deviation of the axle is _eastwardly_. In general, if the ship
is steaming on any course in the north-west or south-east quadrant,
the deviation caused by her rolling will be towards the west. It will
be towards the east if the course is in the north-east or south-west
quadrant. The effect of pitching on a quadrantal course is to cause a
deviation of the axle in the direction opposed to that of the deviation
caused by rolling, so that if the vessel be both rolling and pitching,
the deviation is somewhat less than it would be if rolling only had to
be considered.

It may perhaps be thought that the quadrantal error is an effect
produced by the double gimbal mounting of the compass, and that had
we adhered to our simple model, as shown in Fig. 32, it would not
arise. This is not so. If Fig. 32 be taken as representing, after the
manner of Fig. 33, the north view of the compass on a ship steaming
due north-west, it will be seen that the southern kick at the port
out position causes the axle to precess in the direction K and the
northern kick at the starboard out position in the direction L.
Resolving these movements as before, we see that, while the horizontal
components N Q again cancel, the vertical components M P are, as in
Fig. 33, cumulative in effect, but this time they result in the end B
of the axle moving downwards, and therefore finally cause it to precess
eastwards instead of westwards, as before. The quadrantal error is
therefore not eliminated, but merely reversed in direction by adopting
the simpler mounting for the compass.




CHAPTER XII

THE ELIMINATION OF THE QUADRANTAL ERROR


From our description of the cause of the quadrantal error it should
be clear that it is of a variable erratic nature, or at least that,
unlike the latitude and north steaming errors, its magnitude cannot
be forecast from a knowledge of the ship’s speed, course, latitude,
or other factors. Its direction is determined by the direction of
the ship’s course, but its amount is settled by the violence of the
rolling and pitching, and cannot therefore be calculated and tabulated
in a practically useful way. It follows, therefore, that to get rid of
the upsetting influence of the quadrantal error we cannot resort to
“correcting” the compass readings for it, but must entirely eliminate
it.

In the early (1910) Anschütz compass there were no means of eliminating
the quadrantal error, for the existence of the error, or at least the
importance to be attached to it, was not at first recognised. The
compass, we believe, showed errors from this cause of as much as 20
deg. to 40 deg. As a result, within a very short time the design was
discarded, and what amounted to an entirely different compass was
substituted for it. The 1912 Anschütz compass will be briefly described
later on, but here it may be said that the quadrantal error in it is
eliminated by adding two more gyro-wheels to the sensitive element. The
theory of this compass is not very easy to understand, so that it will
be best if we explain first how the quadrantal error is eliminated in
the Sperry and the Brown compasses.

The early Sperry, like the early Anschütz compass, was open to the full
action of the quadrantal error. In the form now in use, however, it is
prevented from taking effect by controlling automatically the position
of the excentric pin connecting the weight or “bail” to the gyro
casing. In the Sperry compass, as we know, the weight S (Fig. 35) is
not hung from the inner supporting ring or its equivalent, but from the
follow-up or phantom ring, its pendulous effect being communicated to
the casing and thence to the spinning wheel through the excentric pin
A. The kicks of the weight at the out positions during the rolling of
the ship are also transmitted through the pin to the casing and wheel
inside it.

[Illustration: FIG. 35. Sperry Compass on N.W. course.]

Let us suppose, as shown in Fig. 35, that at the port out position
of the compass swing the excentric pin is _east_ of the axis H J by
the amount required just to bring it vertically below the centre of
the spinning wheel. Then the southward kick of the weight when the
vessel rolls on a north-west course is transmitted to the casing as a
southward force applied at the point A. This force, acting about the
axis E F as before, produces precession in the direction K, and, as
before, we may resolve this movement into the components N M. The force
at A has, however, in addition, a turning moment about the axis H J,
for it is applied to the casing at a point lying at a distance A D from
this axis, and not, as in Fig. 33, at a point virtually on it. This
moment about H J would tend to make the end B of the axle turn in the
direction of F, and therefore results, in accordance with the rule of
the gyroscope, in an actual movement about the axis E F, the end B of
the axle precessing downwards towards J, that is, in the direction R.
We may resolve the precession R into two components T U.

Similarly, at the starboard out position, let us suppose that the
excentric pin is this time _westwards_ of the axis H J by exactly the
amount required again to bring it vertically below the centre of the
wheel. As before, in the case shown in Fig. 33, the northward kick of
the weight acting about E F results in a precession L, which may be
resolved into the components P Q. The kick, however, as at the port out
position, also has a moment about the axis H J. The kick is reversed
in direction, but the point of its application to the casing is now on
the other side of H J. Consequently the kick tends to rotate the casing
about H J--and therefore produces precession about E F--in the same
direction as does the kick at the port out position. The precession
produced is represented by V, and can be resolved into the components
W X.

Considering now the four pairs of component precessions, we see that
they cancel out in pairs. Thus N and Q cancel, U cancels X, T wipes out
M, and W does the same to P. The two components M P, which were the
cause of the quadrantal error, are just balanced by the two additional
components T W. The axle therefore does not rise vertically, but
remains horizontal, and as a result no quadrantal error can arise.

It will be seen that the Sperry method of eliminating the quadrantal
error requires the excentric pin to be movable relatively to the
bail and casing. To be more precise, while the casing, the bail, the
phantom ring, and all the other parts of the compass may swing round
the axle of the spinning wheel, or the external gimbal axis coincident
or parallel with the axle, matters have to be arranged in such a way
that when the ship rolls the excentric pin shall not partake of this
motion, but remain constantly in the vertical below the centre of the
spinning wheel. We have to remember, however, that the Sperry method of
damping the horizontal vibrations of the axle hangs upon the pin being
displaced towards the east of the axis H J when the compass is in the
even keel position. The two requirements are met by so controlling the
position of the pin relatively to the bail and casing that when the
bail, casing, etc., swing sideways under the influence of the rolling
of the ship, the pin is maintained at a fixed distance eastwards of the
true vertical through the centre of the spinning wheel at all points in
the oscillation of the bail, casing, etc.

[Illustration: FIG. 36. Sperry Ballistic Gyro.]

The stabilisation of the excentric pin in this manner is effected
gyroscopically by means of the attachment shown in Fig. 36. This device
consists of a small high-speed electrically driven gyroscope running
inside a casing which is mounted rotatably on a vertical axis inside a
stirrup frame. This frame, as shown in Fig. 37, is hung pendulum-wise
on the north side of the main gyro casing, the axis of its suspension
being collinear with the axle of the main gyro-wheel. The axle of the
small gyro-wheel is thus aligned in the east and west direction. The
stirrup bracket is turned up horizontally below the casing of the
small gyro, and at its end is fitted with guides, carrying a pair of
rollers. These rollers constitute the excentric pin and, as shown in
Fig. 37, engage within two curved channel-sectioned tracks attached one
to the bail and one to the main gyro casing. If when the bail, casing,
etc., swing under the influence of the ship’s rolling the excentric
pin should attempt to follow suit--either by reason of friction at the
axis of suspension of the stirrup bracket or at the track rollers--the
wheel and casing of the small gyro will start processing round the
vertical axis inside the stirrup, for the attempt is equivalent to an
endeavour to tilt the small gyro-axle in an east and west vertical
plane, and therefore calls forth the usual gyroscopic reaction. The
precession of the small gyro on its vertical axis is made to react on
the stirrup bracket by means of a spring connection between the bracket
and the casing, as shown in Fig. 36. The direction of spin of the small
gyro-wheel is such that the force thus applied to the stirrup bracket
opposes and just balances the frictional or other force trying to make
it swing with the bail, casing, etc., of the main gyro. In this way the
excentric pin as the vessel rolls is caused to maintain its original
distance from the vertical line through the centre of the spinning
wheel.

[Illustration: FIG. 37. Stabilized Excentric Pin (Sperry Compass).]

The suppression, or rather the avoidance of the quadrantal error in
the Brown compass, is achieved in a manner which is mechanically very
distinct from that adopted for the same purpose in the Sperry compass.

[Illustration: FIG. 38. Diagram of Brown Compass.]

An elementary diagram of the Brown compass is given in Fig. 38. In this
sketch A is the casing, inside which the gyro-wheel mounted on the
axle B (C) rotates in the direction of the dotted arrow--B, as before,
representing the north-seeking end of the axle. The casing is supported
on an east and west horizontal axis E F inside a vertical ring, this
ring being journalled at H J inside a frame D, the equivalent of the
square frame in our simple model. To obtain complete freedom for the
gyro the frame D is mounted on an athwartship axis G K, which is
itself carried inside a ring journalled within the binnacle on an axis
L parallel with the ship’s longitudinal centre line. The pendulum
weight S is fixed to the lowest point of the frame D. If the weight
S and frame D be set swinging on the axis G K, the swinging movement
will, of course, be directly communicated through the journals H J to
the vertical supporting ring, but, as the trunnions E F of the casing
are really supported on knife edges, the swinging movement of the frame
D cannot be communicated from the vertical ring through the trunnions
E F to the casing A, and thence to the wheel. Yet it is essential that
the weight S should be able to act pendulum-wise on the casing and
wheel, for otherwise, as we know, the system would be without directive
force.

[Illustration: FIG. 39. Oil Control Bottles (Brown Compass).]

The connection between the weight and the casing is not a mechanical
one, but is effected by making use of the air blast created by the
fan-like action of the wheel inside the casing. As we have explained
in connection with the damping system adopted in this compass, the
trunnion F is hollow, and delivers the air blast through a nozzle M,
fixed relatively to the vertical supporting ring, into a divided box N.
From this box pipes are led to two oil bottles--one of which is shown
at P--fixed to the casing on the east side of the axle, one bottle
being on the north face of the casing and the other on the south. The
pressure of the air blast acting unequally upon the oil in these two
bottles when the casing tilts about the axis E F results, as we have
already explained, in any horizontal oscillation of the sensitive
element about the axis H J being damped. In a similar way two bottles
Q R half-filled with oil are fixed to the north and south faces of
the casing on the west side of the axle of the spinning wheel. These
bottles are also connected to the box N, but the connecting pipes are
crossed so as to join each bottle Q R to the division of the box
remote from it, and not to the adjacent division, as in the case of
the damping bottles P. When, therefore, the weight S and frame D are
swung slowly pendulum-wise on the axis G K, as shown in the first view
in Fig. 39, the nozzle M, being fixed to the vertical ring, delivers
more air into one division of the box N than the other, and therefore
a greater air pressure is exerted inside one bottle than inside the
other. Consequently oil flows through the connecting pipe T from the
former bottle to the latter until the columns of oil are sufficiently
unequal to balance the difference of pressure of the air inside the
bottles. It will be noticed that the crossing of the pipes connecting
the bottles with the box N results in the oil being accumulated in
that bottle, which lies away from the side to which the weight S has
been swung. Hence, although there is no mechanical connection between
the weight and the casing of the spinning wheel, the effect when the
weight S is swung slowly is thus substantially the same as it would be
if there were, for the weight of the extra oil forced into the bottle
R exerts a turning moment on the casing about the axis E F, and tends
therefore to make the casing follow the deflection of the weight S and
frame D.

Similarly, should the axle B C dip, as shown in the second view in Fig.
39, extra oil will accumulate in the bottle which has been elevated by
the dipping, and as a result a restoring moment about the axis E F will
be applied to the casing, just as it would be if the weight S had been
directly connected to the casing and had been deflected by the dipping
movement.

The second view in Fig. 39 illustrates the generation of the directive
force in the Brown compass. Let us suppose that the compass is at the
equator, and that by some agency the axle is turned so that its end B
points due west. The rotation of the earth will cause the axle to dip
slowly into some such position as that shown. During this slow dipping
movement oil will flow slowly from the bottle Q into the bottle R. The
unbalanced weight of oil will apply a turning moment to the sensitive
element about the axis E F and will therefore produce actual motion
about the axis H J, which will precess the end B of the axle towards
the north. Any tendency for the axle to vibrate about the north and
south line as a result of the momentum acquired by the sensitive
element while coming up from the west will be damped by the air blast
acting upon the oil in the two other bottles P fixed, as shown in Fig.
38, on the east side of the axle.

[Illustration: FIG. 40. Brown Compass on West Course.]

The point we require here to notice especially about this action is
that, as the tilting of the axle produced by the rotation of the earth
takes place very slowly--it cannot exceed the speed of rotation of the
earth on its polar axis, namely, 0.0007 of a revolution per minute--the
flow of oil from the bottle Q to the bottle R takes place very slowly
also. The oil therefore acquires practically no momentum, and rises in
the bottle R in strict accordance with the tilt acquired by the axle.
If the tilting motion be stopped or reversed, the oil would remain in
the bottle R at just the level it had reached, or would immediately
begin to flow back again, for its momentum being negligible, it has not
sufficient kinetic energy to rise higher in the bottle R after the
upward motion of the bottle has ceased.

On the other hand, when the ship rolls, say, on a due west course,
as represented in Fig. 40, the outer gimbal ring supporting the
athwartship axis G K, the frame D carrying the weight S, and the
vertical supporting ring will acquire an oscillation about the fore
and aft axis L in tune with the rolls of the ship. The air blast
will thus be directed into the two divisions of the box alternately,
and therefore oil will flow from one bottle to the other. It is to
be noticed, however, that the rolling motion of the ship induces in
this manner a flow of oil from one bottle to the other at a very much
greater rate than does the tilting action of the earth’s rotation dealt
with above.

A ship rolling through 45 deg., out to out, in a complete period of
10 seconds rotates about its rolling centre with an average velocity
equivalent to 1.5 revolutions per minute--or over 2000 times as fast as
the speed of rotation of the earth on its polar axis--and at the mid
point of its roll it will move with an actual velocity of about twice
the average. The momentum acquired by the oil in flowing from bottle to
bottle is therefore in this case not negligible. In fact, when the ship
reaches one of its out positions and starts to return, the oil does not
immediately begin to flow back into the other bottle, but is carried
by its kinetic energy to a still higher level in the bottle in which
it has been rising. As a result, the oscillation of the oil between
the two bottles lags behind the oscillation of the pendulum weight S,
and therefore that of the ship itself. The lag acquired is such that
the oil is just level in the two bottles when the ship is at either of
its out positions, and when the ship is at the mid point, or even keel
position of its roll, although the air blast is for the moment evenly
distributed between the two compartments of the divided box, the oil
is standing at its maximum level in the bottle on that side of the
wheel from which the ship is recovering herself. The action of the oil
in the bottles during a rapid oscillation of the compass system is,
in fact, quite analogous to that of the water in the Frahm system of
anti-rolling tanks.

It will thus be seen that the net effect of transmitting the “kicks”
derived during rolling from the pendulous weight of the wheel through
the Brown oil bottle arrangement is simply to delay the application of
the kicks to the gyro-wheel by a constant amount, namely, by the time
taken for the ship to roll from either out position to the mid position
or a quarter of a complete period. Thus as the ship sailing due west
rolls through the mid position from starboard to port the compass
system experiences the turning moment about the axis E F, which with a
rigidly fixed pendulum it would receive at the starboard out position
from the northwards kick of the weight. Similarly, the equivalent of
the southwards kick of the weight at the port out position is felt by
the wheel when the compass is passing through the even keel condition
on the subsequent roll from port to starboard. It is clear that with
the ship sailing due west--or east--this delaying of the kick does
not affect the result established previously for a rigidly connected
pendulous weight. Any tendency for the axle to precess towards the
west when the compass is passing through the even keel position in one
direction is completely annulled by the tendency to precess towards the
east at the succeeding passage through the even keel position in the
opposite direction.

On quadrantal courses, however, the delay in the application of the
kick is most important, for when the ship rolls it results in the
elimination of the quadrantal error. That it does so can easily be
understood by reference to Fig. 33. The kicks, being received when
the compass is passing through the even keel position, and not at
the out positions, precess the wheel about the axis H J at a time
when this axis is truly vertical, and not when it is inclined. The
precessional movements have therefore no vertical components M P. They
are represented completely by the horizontal components N Q. The axle
thus does not depart from the horizontal plane, and any movements in
this plane arising from the tendency to precess in the directions N Q
cancel each other at successive passages of the compass through the mid
position.

The early form of Anschütz compass was followed by the 1912 pattern in
which the quadrantal error was successfully eliminated. An example of
the 1910 form was obtained by Messrs. Elliott Brothers, of Lewisham,
from Anschütz and Co., of Kiel, and was, we believe, fitted on board
H.M.S. _New Zealand_. Its defects becoming apparent, its manufacture
in this country was not proceeded with, but upon the appearance of the
improved type in 1912, Messrs. Elliott took up its construction and
supplied several to the Admiralty. The Sperry compass, however, secured
the preference in the British Navy, and with the outbreak of the war
Messrs. Elliott ceased practically to make Anschütz compasses. On the
other hand, the German Navy continued to use the 1912 type of Anschütz
compass, with very little alteration or addition, right throughout the
war. In view of the fact that every German submarine was fitted with a
compass of this form, and bearing in mind the high degree of excellence
attained in the navigation of the enemy’s underwater craft, there can
be no doubt that the modern Anschütz compass is a very satisfactory
device.

In Fig. 41 we give a purely diagrammatic representation of the compass.
The outer square frame may, as usual, be regarded as mounted within
external gimbal rings, providing a fore-and-aft axis and an athwartship
axis. The square frame contains a vertical ring free to turn about the
axis H J and itself containing a horizontal ring mounted on an east
and west axis F E. The pendulum weight S is attached, as usual, to the
inner horizontal ring. The essential difference between the 1912 and
the 1910 forms of Anschütz compass lies in the fact that, as shown in
our diagram, the inner ring, or its equivalent, does not surround a
single gyro-wheel, but has attached to it the casings of three distinct
gyros.

[Illustration: FIG. 41. Diagram of Anschütz (1912) Compass.]

As shown in the first plan--in Fig. 42--the three gyros are situated
at the corners of an equilateral triangle. One gyro K is placed at the
south end of the meridional diameter of the horizontal ring, with its
axle pointing towards the centre of the ring. The two other gyros L M
are placed at 60 deg. east and 60 deg. west of north, with their axes
pointing towards the centre of the gyro K--_not_ towards the centre
of the ring. The wheels of all three gyros rotate anti-clockwise, as
seen from the north, looking south--that is, they rotate in the same
direction as do the wheels of all single-gyro compasses as seen from
the same standpoint.

[Illustration: FIG. 42. Plans of Gyros.]

If we neglect the two gyros L M for the moment, imagining them to be
replaced by simple deadweights to counterbalance the weight of the gyro
K, it will be seen that this system differs from that of the early
Anschütz compass only in the fact that the gyro-wheel has been reduced
in size, and has been displaced from the centre of the horizontal ring
to the southern edge. The displacement of the wheel in this manner in
no way affects the essential working of the compass. In a single-gyro
compass we might with some advantage similarly displace the spinning
wheel, for by so doing and by counterbalancing the displaced weight
we should, at least partially, get rid of the concentration of mass
about the east-west axis, which, as we shall see, introduces, if not
corrected, an additional source of error into the compass readings when
the ship rolls on quadrantal courses.

The reduction in the size of the gyro-wheel would, of course, reduce
the magnitude of the directive force. In the 1912 design the wheels of
all three gyros run at 20,000 revolutions per minute--that is, at the
same speed as the wheel in the 1910 design. But each wheel is only 5
in. in diameter instead of 6 in., and weighs, with its axle, 5 lb. 2
oz., or only half as much as the wheel in the earlier form. The gyro K
considered alone would therefore supply a directive force of but half
the former amount.[6]

It follows, obviously, that if a second gyro of the same speed and size
as that at K be fixed in accurate alignment at the north end of the
meridional diameter of the horizontal ring the directive force at any
angle of horizontal deflection away from the north will be doubled,
that is, will be made equal to that developed in the 1910 design. Such
a compass might be constructed, but it would exhibit the quadrantal
error--or at least the inertia force portion of that error--just as
badly as did the early Anschütz.

The essence of the 1912 design lies in the fact that not one but two
gyros are attached to the north side of the horizontal ring, and in the
additional fact that the axles of these two gyros are not parallel with
but are inclined to the axle of the south gyro K.

When the sensitive element of this compass is in the north resting
position, the axle of the gyro K is aligned with the meridian and
therefore the rotation of the earth--the compass being supposed at the
equator--merely moves the axle parallel with itself. On the other hand,
with the sensitive element in the north resting position, the axles of
the gyros L M are inclined to the meridian at 30 deg. The gyro L is
virtually in the condition of a single-gyro compass, with the north end
of its axle partially turned towards the east. Under this condition, as
we know, the rotation of the earth will tend to make the north end B of
the axle rise above the horizontal plane. Conversely, the gyro M is in
the condition of a single-gyro compass, with the north end of its axle
partially turned towards the west. The earth’s rotation in this case
tends to make the north end of the axle dip below the horizontal plane.
Thus, in the 1912 Anschütz compass, when the sensitive element is in
the north resting position, the gyro K under the rotation of the earth
is without effect on the pendulous weight S, the gyro L is striving
to swing it towards the north, and the gyro M is trying with an equal
effort to swing it towards the south. The weight, therefore, remains
in the plumb line and applies no turning moment to any of the gyros.
As there is no turning moment, there is no precessional tendency. The
sensitive element remains directed towards the north. This alignment,
as in a single-gyro system, is the true resting position, and under it
no directive force is applied to the sensitive element.

To study how the three gyros act together to restore the sensitive
element to the north resting position should it be deflected
therefrom, let us suppose that the deflection suffered is one of 30
deg. towards the east. As shown in the second plan in Fig. 42, the
effect of such a deflection is to place the three gyros K L M in the
condition respectively of a single-gyro system when the axle is (_k_)
deflected 30 deg. to the east, (_l_) deflected 60 deg. to the east,
and (_m_) aligned on the north. At this deflection, then, the gyro M
contributes no restoring force. The directive force contributed by the
gyro K is half that contributed by the single gyro of the 1910 design
when the deflection is 30 deg., for the mass--or moment of inertia--of
the wheel is half the earlier value. The directive force contributed
by the gyro L is something greater than that contributed by the gyro
K, for the virtual deflection eastwards is 60 deg. instead of 30 deg.,
and, as we know, the directive force increases with the deflection.
Thus, the three gyros taken together supply a directive force, when
the sensitive element is deflected through 30 deg., which is somewhat
greater than that supplied by the single double-sized wheel of the
1910 design.[7] This result is a general one. Whatever the deflection
may be, the directive force supplied by the three-gyro compass is
always about one-third greater than the directive force of the 1910
design at the same deflection. This increased force is developed even
if the deflection be less than 30 deg. In such cases the gyro M will,
of course, supply a force, a non-restoring force, to the sensitive
element. Only when the deflection exceeds 30 deg. eastwards does the
gyro M assist the gyros K and L to restore the sensitive element to
the north resting position. If the deflection be to the west, however,
the gyro M is the chief assistant of the gyro K, a laggard’s part being
played by the gyro L until 30 deg. of westerly deflection is reached.

The manner in which this three-gyro system avoids the quadrantal error
can now be discussed. The quadrantal error, it may be recalled, arises
when the ship rolls on an intercardinal course, and is primarily
caused by the fact that the whole compass system can swing on its
external gimbal axis in tune with the rolls of the ship. If we could
so arrange matters that during the roll of the ship from side to side
the compass system would swing on the external gimbals, no more and no
less than the amount required just to keep the axis H J truly vertical
at all points of the roll, then the north and south “kicks” received
on the weight S at the out positions of the roll would cause the
sensitive element to precess first one way, then the other, but always
in a horizontal plane. There would be no vertical component in the
precession, the cumulative effect of which, as we have seen, produces
the quadrantal error.

In the Brown compass, the quadrantal error is eliminated by delaying
the effect of the “kicks” on the weight S until the axis H J is truly
vertical--that is to say, the “kicks” on the weight are not transmitted
to the spinning wheel until the compass system is passing through the
even keel position. In the Sperry compass the weight S is virtually
shifted back and forth from east to west of the axis H J in tune
with the rolling of the ship in such a way as to introduce a second
component of vertical precession, which in amount and direction is just
sufficient to nullify the vertical component causing the quadrantal
error. In the 1912 Anschütz compass, the object aimed at is the
maintenance of the axis H J truly vertical at all times during the
rolling condition.

This object is achieved, as we shall now show, by setting the axles
of the gyros L M--Fig. 41--inclined to the axle of the gyro K. In a
single-gyro compass, or in the 1912 Anschütz compass with the gyros
L M suppressed, the system is very stiff against vibrations on the
east-west axis E F, but is quite easily set vibrating about the
north-south axis provided by the external gimbal mounting. The reason
is, of course, that any vibration about the axis E F is met by the
resistance of the gyro-wheel, for the vibration causes the axle to
alter its direction, whereas no gyroscopic resistance is called into
play by the vibration on the north and south axis, for this axis is
coincident or parallel with the gyro-axle. Thus, in the 1910 Anschütz
compass the period of vibration about the east-west axis was something
like 70 min., whereas the period about the north and south axis was
only one or two seconds. The smallness of the latter period readily
resulted in the compass system getting into a swing in tune with the
period of rolling of the ship--from five to twelve seconds or so. Were
the axles of the gyros L M in the 1912 form set parallel with that
of the gyro K, there would still be no gyroscopic resistance exerted
against vibration on the north-south axis. As it is, the inclination of
the axles of these two gyros, taken together, has virtually the same
effect as would be obtained by the addition to the sensitive element of
a separate single gyro, with its axle aligned at right angles to the
axle of the gyro K.

The gyroscopic stiffness against vibration about the east-west axis
E F is hardly affected by the inclination of the gyros L M at the
angle chosen by the designers. The resistance, instead of being that
contributed by three gyros, is equivalent to that supplied by about
2¾ gyros. The period of vibration on this axis E F is arranged to be
the standard 85 min. About the north and south axis we have virtually
the resistance of one gyro. The period of vibration about this axis,
instead of being only one or two seconds, is about 80 sec. With this
lengthened period of vibration there is practically no chance of the
compass system getting into a swing in tune with the rolling of the
ship, for every 2½ to 6 seconds the vibrating influence is reversed
in direction, and in this interval of time the system cannot acquire
any substantial degree of swinging motion. Thus, as the compass,
following the rolls of the ship, moves from side to side, it suffers
a pure translational movement. The axis H J remains truly vertical at
all instants during the roll, and therefore the north and south kicks
of the pendulous weight at the out positions of the roll precess the
gyro-axle about H J in purely a horizontal plane, the precessional
tendency at one out position cancelling that at the other. There is no
vertical component in the precession, and therefore there can be no
quadrantal error.

It is of interest and of some amusement to note that during the war
the Germans applied a fourth gyro to the Anschütz compass, and that
this additional gyro was carefully removed from every compass before
they surrendered their submarines to us. The deceit was, however,
of no avail, for the application of the fourth gyro was known to
us long before the war ended, a complete compass so fitted having
been recovered from a sunken submarine and repaired and carefully
studied. The fourth gyro was applied to the external gimbal rings.
These rings, when the submarine rolled, were found to acquire at times
a violent oscillation of their own, for, of course, they received
no stabilisation from the gyroscopic elements of the compass. On
board submarines the violence with which the rings vibrated would
occasionally threaten to wreck the compass. By adding a gyroscope to
the gimbal rings, the period of vibration of the rings was lengthened
to about 16 sec., so that little or no opportunity to swing was left
to them. With the exception of this addition, the Anschütz 1912
compass was used by the Germans throughout the war practically without
alteration.




CHAPTER XIII

CENTRIFUGAL FORCES DURING QUADRANTAL ROLLING


In addition to the “kicks” of the pendulous weight, which during
quadrantal rolling, as we have seen, react gyroscopically upon the
compass and tend to make the axle deviate from the north, there is a
second influence at work on the compass, which, when the vessel rolls
on an intercardinal course, likewise tends to deviate the axle. The two
deviations are always in the same direction, so that we cannot arrange
the one to reduce or eliminate the other. The second deviation arises
from the centrifugal forces developed in the compass parts during
quadrantal rolling. These forces, like the kicks of the pendulous
weight, react gyroscopically upon the spinning wheel, and if not
checked will deviate the axle away from the north.

[Illustration: FIG. 43. Centrifugal Forces on a Pendulum.]

Let us consider the somewhat unusual type of pendulum shown in Fig. 43,
a pendulum the rod A of which is fixed rigidly to the bar B carried
on knife edges, and of which the “bob” is in the form of a cylinder
suspended at its mid point from the rod A in such a way as to permit
the bob to turn horizontally on the bearing at C, substantially without
friction. In the first instance, let the pendulum be set swinging about
the knife edges with the cylindrical bob set parallel with the axis B.
Each portion of the bob is thus caused to swing about that point on the
axis B which is vertically over the portion when the bob is at rest.
The centrifugal force developed on each portion is at all positions of
the swing directed radially from such point. The centrifugal force
on each portion is a maximum when the bob is passing through the
mid position, and falls, with the velocity, to zero at each of the
out positions. At the mid position the centrifugal force on the two
extreme portions L M of the bob may be represented by D E. These two
forces are equal and are directed vertically downwards. On all other
similar portions the centrifugal force at the same instant is similar
in magnitude and direction. The net effect of the centrifugal forces
on all the portions is thus simply a tendency to bend the bob ends
downwards about the central line at C. They have clearly no tendency
either at the mid position of the swing or at any other to turn the bob
round the axis C at the foot of the rod.

Let us now set the pendulum swinging with the bob arranged at right
angles to the knife-edge axis, as shown in the second view of Fig. 43.
Each and every portion of the bob is now swinging about the one point F
on the axis. At any instant in the swing the centrifugal force on any
portion is directed along the line joining the point F to the centre of
that portion. Taking the two extreme end portions L M as the bob passes
through the mid position, the centrifugal forces are as indicated at
G H. They are not now vertical nor parallel with each other, but,
again, they have no tendency to turn the bob horizontally about the
axis at C. Resolving them into vertical and horizontal components,
we see that the net effect of all the centrifugal forces is to try
to bend the ends of the bob downwards--the effect of the vertical
components--combined with the application to the bob of a horizontal
stretching force--the effect of the horizontal components.

Let us, however, rotate the bob about the axis at C through something
less than 90 deg. from the first position--say, through 45 deg., as
indicated in the third sketch. Consider again the two extreme end
portions as the bob is passing through the mid position of its swing.
Let J K be a line through the centre of the bob parallel with the
knife-edge axis. From the centres of the end portions, let lines L N
and M P be drawn at right angles to J K. From N and P draw lines
upwards parallel with the rod A to meet the knife-edge axis at Q and R.
Then Q and R are the points about which the two extreme portions of the
bob are swinging. The centrifugal forces on these portions are directed
along the lines Q L and R M, and are indicated at S and T. These
forces may, as shown, be resolved into vertical components--parallel
with Q N and R P--and horizontal components--parallel with N L and P M.
Treating the other portions of the bob similarly, it will be seen that
while the vertical components of the centrifugal forces, as before,
merely tend to bend the ends of the bob downwards, the horizontal
components are no longer parallel with the length of the bob, as in the
second sketch. They are inclined to the bob and clearly apply to it a
moment which will turn it about the axis at C in the direction of the
arrow U until the bob reaches the position shown in the second sketch.

It is obvious that any rotation of the bob on the axis at C away from
the position shown in the first sketch, even a slight one, will call
into action horizontal components of centrifugal force after the manner
shown in the third sketch. The equilibrium of the bob in the position
shown in the first sketch is therefore unstable. With the bob in the
second position a movement of the end L to the _left_ will, as we know,
call into action horizontal components of centrifugal force, tending
to turn the bob about C in the direction of the arrow U. If the end L
is moved to the _right_ the horizontal components, as can easily be
verified by repeating the argument, will tend to turn the bob about C
in the direction opposed to the arrow U. Thus deflection to either side
of the second position calls forth forces which lead the bob to recover
that position. We conclude, therefore, that the second position is one
of stable equilibrium.

It may further be shown by repeating the argument that if the bob
is rotated about C from the first position in such a way as to send
the end L to the _rear_ the horizontal components called into action
tend to set the bob into the second position with the end L pointing
_backwards_, and that when the bob is so aligned relatively to the
knife-edge axis the equilibrium is again stable. Thus, altogether,
if the bob is parallel with the knife-edge axis, the equilibrium is
unstable. If it is at right angles the equilibrium is stable. If it is
set into any intermediate position, forces are called into play which
endeavour to align it at right angles to the knife-edge axis.

Let a second cylindrical bob of the same size and weight be attached
to the first at right angles to it and in the same plane. Then in all
positions of the bobs relatively to the knife-edge axis the equilibrium
will be stable, for at any setting of the bobs the rotary force about C
developed by the one bob will be equal and opposed in direction to that
developed by the other bob.

The above discussion covers a principle of considerable general
importance in mathematical physics. Briefly put, it shows us that a
body suspended pendulum-wise in the manner sketched will develop a
tendency when swung to set its longer axis parallel with the plane
of the swing, and that to avoid this tendency in a swinging body
mounted in the manner we have indicated, the mass of the body must
be distributed symmetrically and equally about the pendulum rod, so
that there shall be no “longer axis.”[8] So far as the gyro-compass is
concerned, the circumstances described necessitate--at least in the
Sperry and Brown compasses--the addition of compensator weights to
represent the second cylindrical bob to which we have referred above.

The masses composing the gyro-compass are not disposed symmetrically
and equally about the vertical axis--the axis which we have throughout
called H J. As seen in plan, the masses are concentrated towards the
east and west plane containing the spinning wheel, and are deficient
towards the north and south. By virtue of the presence of the
pendulous weight, or its equivalent, below the spinning wheel, the
whole mass of the compass is capable of swinging pendulum-wise, the
axis of this swing being one or other of the axes of the external
gimbal mounting. Further, the swinging mass is free--if the wheel is
not spinning--to turn about the vertical axis which we have called H J.
Reference to Fig. 31 will make these statements quite clear.

Thus the compass and its system of mounting inevitably reproduce the
essential features of the pendulum shown in Fig. 43. Taking the second
sketch in that engraving, the bob represents the masses of the compass
concentrated in the east and west plane. The gyro-axle being at right
angles to this plane is parallel with the knife-edge axis B. This
axis B may be regarded as representing the longitudinal axis of the
external gimbal mounting, so that in the conditions imagined the ship
is supposed to be sailing due north or south. It is clear that when the
ship rolls on either of these courses, the fact that the mass of the
compass is concentrated in the east and west plane will not tend to
deviate the axle, for the “pendulum bob” is in its position of stable
equilibrium.

The first sketch similarly represents the condition of matters existing
when the ship rolls on an east or west course, the knife-edge axis
B again being identified with the longitudinal axis of the external
gimbal mounting. The pendulum bob is now in its position of unstable
equilibrium, so that if the mass distribution of the compass is not
corrected by the addition of compensator weights, a tendency for the
axle to deviate away from the north _may_ occur.

If we identify the knife-edge axis B with the athwartship axis of the
external gimbal mounting, the second sketch in Fig. 43 illustrates the
condition of matters existing when the ship _pitches_ on an east or
west course, while the first will represent pitching on a due north or
south course.

On quadrantal courses, failure to correct the inequality of the mass
distribution, if that distribution is not uniform, will _inevitably_
result in the axle deviating when the ship rolls. Thus, the third
view in Fig. 43 represents the conditions prevailing when the ship
rolls on a due north-west--or south-east--course. Looking at the
plan, the line J K represents the direction of the longitudinal axis
of the external gimbal mounting and therefore the direction of the
ship’s course, while a line at right angles to the pendulum bob would
represent the gyro-axle, and therefore the north and south direction.
When the ship rolls the compass masses oscillate pendulum-wise about
the external longitudinal gimbal axis--represented by the bar B--but
the directive force of the compass tends to preserve the general plane
of the oscillating masses inclined at 45 deg. to the direction of the
bar B. As a result, the horizontal components of the centrifugal forces
developed in the compass masses apply to the wheel, casing, etc., a
turning moment in the direction of the arrow U. This moment, it will
be seen, tends to turn the sensitive element in the same direction as
that in which the “kicks” of the weight at the out positions of the
swing endeavour to deviate the axle on the same course. The centrifugal
moment would, however, cause an actual deviation in the direction U in
a direct manner only if the gyro-wheel were not spinning. As it is, the
centrifugal moment causes the north end of the gyro-axle to precess
upwards and therefore leads to a deflection of the pendulous weight
of the north. This deflection throws a turning moment on to the wheel
about the horizontal axis--the axis we have called E F throughout--and,
finally, this turning moment precesses the axle horizontally in
the direction of the arrow U. Thus, with the wheel spinning, the
centrifugal moment actually does produce rotation in the direction U,
but its action is not direct.

As we have said, the tendency of the axle to deviate during rolling on
quadrantal courses as a result of the action of centrifugal forces,
is corrected in those compasses requiring it by the addition to the
compass masses of compensator weights on the north and south sides of
the sensitive element. These weights are adjusted for mass and position
in such a way as to make the mass distribution of the sensitive element
substantially the same in the north and south direction as in the east
and west. In this way the centrifugal forces tending to cause deviation
are neutralised on all courses, both during rolling and pitching.




CHAPTER XIV

THE ANSCHÜTZ (1910) COMPASS


Some few words of description fall to be made regarding certain
mechanical and electrical features of the principal types of
gyro-compass--features, that is, which, not being primarily connected
with the gyroscopic behaviour of the compass, have not so far been
mentioned in our discussion of the general theory of the device.

A sectional diagrammatic view of the early form of Anschütz compass is
given in Fig. 44. This compass, although it is now obsolete by reason
of the fact that no provision was made in its design for the quadrantal
error, is still, we think, of interest from other than the historical
point of view.

[Illustration: FIG. 44. The Anschütz (1910) Compass.]

The gyro-wheel is shown at A. The axle is carried in bearings inside
the casing B. This casing is attached to a tubular stalk C, which is
fixed to a head D carrying the compass card R. This system of parts
as a whole is floated in mercury Q contained inside a circular steel
bowl K, the flotation being secured by means of a hollow steel ring S
joined to the head D by a dome-shaped member E, which is perforated
all over for the sake of lightness. As the float S is completely
immersed in the mercury, the exact level to which it will sink can be
delicately settled by controlling the form of the bore inside the head
D. The central position of the float inside the bowl is controlled
by means of a steel stem T fixed at its upper end to the centre of
the glass G covering the card and pointed at its lower end to dip
into a cup containing mercury which is fixed centrally inside the
stalk C. The stem T is insulated, and is enclosed within a tube, the
upper end of which is also attached to the glass G and the lower end
of which is splayed out to dip into a second mercury cup surrounding
but insulated from the first. Through this tube and its mercury cup
one phase of a three-phase current is led to the motor driving the
gyro-wheel from the terminal F. The second phase reaches the motor
from the terminal H by way of the stem T, while the third phase is
transmitted through the bowl, the mercury Q, and the float. The bowl is
provided with knife-edge bearings at L, whereby the whole system shown
is mounted within two gimbal rings providing the external longitudinal
and athwartship axes. The outer gimbal ring is supported inside
the binnacle by means of springs, the attachments of these springs,
as well as the gimbal supports, being insulated on account of the
method adopted for transmitting the third phase of the current to the
gyro-motor. The gyro-axle runs on ball bearings. The driving motor
comprises a stator carrying the windings and fixed inside the casing B
and a rotor forming a rigid part of the gyro-wheel itself.

It will be seen that this design of compass does not explicitly
reproduce the horizontal axis E F, nor the pendulous weight S of our
simple model. The float is, however, free to tilt within the bowl
in any direction, so that the system of suspension is practically
equivalent to the provision of an infinite number of horizontal axes
E F. As regards the apparent absence of the pendulous weight, it is to
be noted that the centre of gravity of the floating system is below
its metacentre, and therefore that the pendulum effect is exactly
reproduced. The damping details are not shown in the engraving, but
they are substantially as we have described them previously.

In view of the high speed, 20,000 revolutions per minute, at which the
gyro-wheel runs, giving a stress in the rim of about 10 tons per square
inch and a peripheral velocity of 340 miles an hour, it is of interest
to note that during a test to destruction the wheel did not fail until
it was being driven at a speed involving the supply to it of five times
the normal driving power. A special motor generator had to be built
to enable this test to be carried out. Even the normal motor driving
the gyro-wheel had to be specially designed, for no motor capable of
running at 20,000 revolutions was at the time commercially available,
while the small space within which it had to be accommodated rendered
the question of temperature rise a very serious one. It was found,
it may be added, that in designing the motor the usually accepted
magnetic constants for the iron in the motor did not hold good with a
periodicity as high as 333 cycles per second.

The flotation of the sensitive element in mercury is a simple and
convenient method of obtaining a practically frictionless support for
the vertical axis--the axis H J of our elementary model. The absence
of friction arises from the facts that the drag of the mercury on
the parts of the sensitive element with which it is in contact is
proportional to the velocity with which the parts move through it,
and that this velocity is always extremely slow. If the mercury is
freshly distilled, there is, it would appear, substantial absence of
frictional drag. But in course of time dust, oil, etc., may collect on
the surface of the mercury, and may introduce a drag on the sensitive
element of sufficient amount to interfere with the accuracy of the
compass readings. The suspension of the vertical axis by flotation
has, however, the advantage that no external gimbal rings need be
provided to give the sensitive element three degrees of freedom in all
configurations. The sensitive element, as we have said, is virtually
provided with an infinite number of horizontal axes, so that within
the bowl itself there is always a longitudinal and an athwartship axis
about which the sensitive element may turn. The external gimbal axes
provided in this compass permit the bowl to remain horizontal when the
ship rolls or pitches; they are not essential gyroscopically. A similar
remark applies to the later form of Anschütz compass in which the
sensitive element is also floated in mercury.




CHAPTER XV

THE SPERRY COMPASS


A general view of the Sperry compass as removed from the binnacle is
given in Fig. 45. This view depicts the compass as it would be seen
looking forward on a vessel steaming towards the south-west. At A
is shown the compensator weight on the north side of the sensitive
element, and at B the ballistic gyro is to be seen. The ring C is the
inner of the two external gimbal rings, and carries on an athwartship
axis D the spider E, from which the sensitive element is suspended.
At F may be seen one of the bearings whereon this ring is swung on
a longitudinal axis within the outer gimbal ring. The outer ring,
in turn, is hung on springs attached to the inside of the binnacle.
The speed and latitude corrector dials are to be seen directly
above the bearing F, while behind them the inclined cosine ring or
course corrector ring is visible. The phantom ring is shown at G.
This ring in section is channel-shaped, and in the view hides the
vertical ring within which the casing of the gyro-wheel is journalled
on the horizontal east and west axis. It is to be carefully noted
that the lugs H, by which the compensator weights are attached to
the sensitive element, are not fixed to the phantom ring, but pass
through easy-fitting holes therein, and are directly secured to the
vertical ring inside. The bail weight lies within the phantom and
vertical rings, and can be seen at J, the tracks for the excentric
pin, one on the bail and the other on the wheel casing, being shown
at K. The stirrups L are fixed to the ends of the bail, and carry
the pins whereon the bail is swung from the phantom ring. The bail
latitude corrector dial, whereby the bail is allowed to assume the tilt
appropriate to each latitude without disturbing the horizontality of
the gyro-axle, is visible behind the stirrup. The horizontality of the
axle is indicated on a level attached at this point to two brackets
springing from the wheel casing.

[Illustration: FIG. 45. The Sperry Compass Removed from Binnacle.]

[Illustration: FIG. 46. The Sperry Compass.]

Of the non-gyroscopic mechanical details of this compass, chief
interest probably centres in the method of providing the vertical axis
about which the sensitive element may turn relatively to the spider E
in a substantially frictionless manner. In Fig. 46 we give a diagram
of the compass as we would see it looking aft on a ship steaming due
south. It will be seen from this diagram that the phantom ring, shown
in black section, is extended at the top to form a horizontal flange.
On this flange the angular divisions of the compass card are engraved.
The phantom ring is also formed with a central hollow stalk whereby
it is hung on ball bearings within the central boss of the spider. A
torsionless wire composed of several strands of steel is secured at
one end to a cap fixed over the top of the stalk, and at the lower
end is secured to a ball-borne pin forming part of the vertical ring.
Diametrically below, the vertical ring and the phantom are united by
a pivot pin. The gyro case, as we have explained before, is carried
on a horizontal axis within the vertical ring, while the bail is
swung on the phantom. The phantom and all within it may be regarded
as the sensitive element, the constant alignment of which in the
north and south direction gives the device its utility as a compass.
The spider carrying the lubber ring and all outside it move round
the wire-and-pivot-pin vertical axis with the ship when the course
is altered. When such a movement occurs the absence of any direct
mechanical connection of a rigid nature between the phantom ring on the
one hand and the rest of the sensitive element on the other would tend
to result in the phantom ring following the movement of the spider,
binnacle, and ship rather than in its remaining stationary with the
wheel, casing, and vertical ring. The suspension wire would thus be
twisted. As we have previously explained, however, the phantom ring
is formed just below the card with a circular rack with which there
meshes a pinion driven through reduction gearing by a small electric
motor--the azimuth motor--attached to the spider. The starting and
stopping of this motor and the direction of its rotation are controlled
automatically by means of gold-rimmed wheels on two trolley heads fixed
to the vertical ring and certain gold-faced contactors on the phantom.
Thus when the ship’s course is altered the azimuth motor is started up
in the direction required to take the twist out of the suspension wire
and bring the phantom into alignment with the rest of the sensitive
element. When this alignment is reached the motor is automatically
cut out. In actual use the phantom overshoots the exact position of
alignment by a very small amount, bringing the reverse contactors into
action and starting the motor in the reverse direction. The phantom,
in fact, oscillates about the position of alignment with the sensitive
element through, roughly, a quarter of a degree. This small vibration
is transmitted to the repeater compasses elsewhere in the ship, and is
of practical value in that its visibility is some assurance that the
master compass is working correctly.

It will be seen, then, that the absence of friction about the vertical
axis of the Sperry compass is secured by suspending the sensitive
element within a member--the phantom ring--the frictional drag on which
is eliminated by driving it by power in such a way that it follows all
the movements of the sensitive element relatively to the supporting
spider in an automatic and substantially instantaneous and dead-beat
manner.

The repeater compasses are operated electrically from the master
compass through a transmitter and a pinion meshing with the circular
rack on the phantom. The pinion is journalled on a pin depending from
the lubber ring, and therefore transmits to the repeaters not only the
relative movement between the phantom and the binnacle, but, as we
have before explained, any movement of the lubber ring relatively to
the binnacle which may be made to correct the reading of the master
compass for the latitude and north steaming errors. In this way the
repeater compasses always indicate true north both for course-setting
purposes and for the purpose of taking bearings on passing objects. It
is regarded as outside the scope of this discussion to describe the
mechanical features of the repeater compasses. It may, however, be
remarked that the fact that they may be fitted in any number and in any
position, and that automatic course recorders and similar devices may
also readily be linked up with the gyro-compass, forms a very strong
reason in itself for recommending the adoption of the gyroscopic rather
than the magnetic compass on board ship.




CHAPTER XVI

THE BROWN COMPASS


The Brown compass is the invention of Mr. S. G. Brown, F.R.S., of
North Acton, with Professor John Perry, F.R.S., in association as
technical adviser and co-patentee. It has been evolved after five years
of laborious experimental work, and is claimed to be the only British
gyroscopic compass so far constructed and applied on board ship.

[Illustration: FIG. 47. The Brown Compass Removed from Binnacle.]

[Illustration: FIG. 48. The Brown Compass Removed from Binnacle.]

[Illustration: FIG. 49. The Brown Compass.]

In Fig. 47 we show the Brown compass as seen looking forward on a
vessel steaming due north. The south end of the gyro-axle is pointing
towards the reader. In Fig. 48 it is shown as it would be seen when
looking forward on a vessel steaming due west. The north end of the
axle is pointing to the right in this view. In the line engraving
(Fig. 49) we are supposed to be looking forward on a vessel steaming
due south. The north end of the axle is therefore pointing toward us.
In the half-tone engravings the compass is shown removed from its
external gimbal rings. The axis A (Fig. 47), it will be understood,
is the athwartship axis of the external mounting. It is mounted on
ball bearings within a couple of small brackets which by means of four
screws are attached to the inner gimbal ring, as shown in Fig. 49.
This inner ring, in turn, is carried on a longitudinal axis inside
an outer gimbal ring, which, finally, is hung on springs from the
binnacle. The frame B, within which the sensitive element proper is
mounted, is very much as we have represented it to be in our previous
diagrams, except that it swings pendulum-wise on the axis A--or the
other axis of the external mounting--not because of the attachment to
it at its lowest point of an actual bob weight, but because its centre
of gravity is designedly below the axis of suspension, and because at
its lowest point it carries a casing containing an electric motor and
other adjuncts possessing a degree of weight.

As shown best in Fig. 49, the frame B supports a vertical ring C
carrying the compass card, and within which the casing D containing
the gyro-wheel is mounted on a horizontal, east and west, knife-edge
axis. The easterly end of this knife-edged axis--towards the left in
the engraving--has associated with it the nozzle and divided air box,
whereby, as we have explained, the pressure of the air blast generated
inside the casing by the spinning wheel is transmitted by open and
crossed pipes respectively to the oil-damping bottles E and the oil
control bottles F.

What we regard as the most interesting non-gyroscopic feature of the
Brown compass is the manner in which the vertical ring C is supported
within the frame B. The ring at its highest point is formed with a
vertical trunnion, which at its top is guided within a ball bearing
fixed in the central boss of the frame B. Three slip rings lower down
on the trunnion acting in conjunction with three mercury contact rings
attached to the frame serve to conduct three-phase current to the
sensitive element. At the lower side the vertical ring is also provided
with a trunnion, which is of the nature of a foot-step bearing. In
reality, however, the trunnion is never allowed to touch the bottom of
its bearing, for it--and with it the vertical ring, the compass card,
and the whole of the sensitive element--is forced, by means of a supply
of oil delivered below it, to vibrate up and down through about an
eighth of an inch at the rate of some 180 times a minute. Before the
trunnion can fall to the foot of its bearing it gets a fresh kick up
by the oil, so that no actual metal-to-metal contact is established.
The oil supply is drawn from and returned to the reservoir G by a pump
driven from an electric motor H. The slight rapid vibratory motion
thus communicated to the sensitive element has no appreciable effect
upon the ease or accuracy with which the compass card may be read. On
the other hand, it is sufficient to relieve the frictional resistance
to turning at the upper and lower trunnions of the vertical ring in
accordance with the well-known fact that if we overcome friction in one
direction we overcome it also in the direction at right angles to the
first.

A second mechanical feature of the Brown compass of outstanding
interest is the method adopted for transmitting the indications of the
master compass card to the repeater compasses. The problem to be solved
in this matter is to establish connection with the master compass card
in a manner which shall impose no frictional or other drag on that
card. To this end in the Brown compass the air blast generated by the
spinning wheel is called upon to fulfil a function additional to those
to which we have already referred. The air blast is delivered not only
from the eastern, but also from the western end of the horizontal
axis of the casing. It is thus directed through a nozzle J against
the face of a contact maker K containing a pair of disc-like plungers
working in balanced connection within two cylinders. Opposite each
plunger is a slot, and when no movement has to be transmitted to the
repeater compasses the air blast is directed against the blank wall
between these two slots or enters each slot in equal proportion. Thus
the plungers being balanced, neither makes contact. If, however, the
ship’s course is altered, the contact maker K, being attached to a
ring L beneath the lubber ring, moves with the ship, while the nozzle
J remains stationary with the sensitive element. Thus the air blast
exerts unequal pressures on the plungers, and one of them is forced
back to make contact. As a result, a step-by-step electric motor M
carried on the frame B and in mesh through reduction gearing with a
rack on the ring L is started up and turns the ring in the direction
required to make the two slots again divide the air blast equally. When
this neutral position is reached the motor is cut out. As in the Sperry
compass, the follow-up motion is open to a little hunting movement as
a result of the momentum acquired by the parts. Ignoring this hunting
movement, the ring L and the contact maker K are thus driven to remain
stationary in fixed relationship with the sensitive element no matter
to what extent the frame B may move with the ship when the course is
altered. The relative movement between the ring L and the frame B
is communicated to the repeater compasses in an electrical manner.
The details of the electrical transmission are outside the ambit of
this discussion, but we may say that the movements communicated to
the repeater compasses are derived from a distributor on the compass
switchboard, this distributor being arranged to operate in exact
synchronism with the follow-up ring L. It is claimed for the Brown
system of transmission between the master and the repeater compasses
that even should the whole repeater system break down the correct
action of the master compass will not thereby be affected.




CHAPTER XVII

THE ANSCHÜTZ (1912) COMPASS


A plan and sectional elevation of the modern form of Anschütz compass
are given in Figs. 50 and 51. The casings of the three gyros K L M hang
by vertical stalks below a triangular spider A at the centre of which
is affixed a float B immersed in a bowl C containing mercury. After the
manner followed in the 1910 form, the float and all attached to it are
centralised relatively to the bowl by means of a rod D fixed centrally
to the cover of the compass. As before, this rod D is composed of a
central core and a liner insulated from the core. The ends of the core
and liner dip into two concentric mercury cups carried within the
float in order that two phases of the three-phase current driving the
gyro-motors may be transmitted through the core and liner of the rod
D. The third phase is transmitted through the mercury and float by
earthing the bowl C.

Matters are so arranged that the centre of flotation of the float B
and its attached parts is above the centre of gravity of the floating
parts. These floating parts--the spider A, the float B, the three
gyros, and other items not yet mentioned--constitute the sensitive
element, so that this element, as in the 1910 form, does not need the
addition of a separate weight to provide the required pendulum action
about a horizontal axis through the centre of flotation. Instead of
there being but one such horizontal axis--the east and west axis E F of
our models and diagrams--it is clear that the support of the sensitive
element by means of a float provides the element with an east and west
horizontal axis and an infinite number of other horizontal axes.

[Illustration: FIG. 50. Plan of Anschütz (1912) Compass.]

Attached to the spider A--and therefore forming a portion of the
sensitive element--is a sheet metal annular casing of the section shown
at E E or F F. The gyros are enclosed within this casing. Ventilating
tubes and baffles G are provided at points on the casing between each
pair of gyros. The compass card--in the form really of a ring--is
attached to the casing at H. Regarding the casing and the spider A
as the equivalent of the horizontal ring shown in our diagram (Fig.
41), it will be noticed that the gyro casings are not fixed rigidly to
it, but are really mounted on ball bearings surrounding their stalks,
so that they may rotate about a vertical axis relatively to the rest
of the sensitive element. As shown in the plan view, however, the
casing of the gyro K is connected by two springs J to the rest of the
sensitive element, so that in whichever way the gyro turns on the ball
bearings it applies through one or other of the springs a force in
the same direction to the annular casing, etc. The gyro is therefore
substantially, though not actually, rigidly connected to the rest
of the sensitive element, the springs being introduced to provide a
yielding connection which will prevent the full force of a sudden turn
of the ship from being thrown all at once on to the gyro. The gyros L M
are similarly connected to the rest of the sensitive element, but in
their case one pair of springs is made to serve both gyros by employing
links and a bell-crank lever. The springs, it may be remarked,
undoubtedly do play a part in the transmission of the directive force
from the gyros to the card and in the avoidance of the quadrantal
error. But their presence is not essential to the fundamental principle
of action of the compass.

The damping system of the 1912 design is of a very simple nature, and
represents a great improvement over the air blast method previously
used. Although the wheels are not required to act as blowers,
their casings are not exhausted of air. The casings, in fact, are
perforated with four large holes on each side, the cooling effect of
the circulating air being regarded as of more value in practice than
the saving of power which would result if the wheels were run in an
exhausted atmosphere.

The damping force is supplied by the weight of a body of oil contained
within a trough N extending right round the foot of the annular casing
containing the gyros. This trough, a circle as seen in plan, is blocked
by eight bulkheads, one each below the north and south points of the
compass card, and the others equally spaced round the trough. Through
each bulkhead a short pipe passes, so that the oil in the trough may
flow from one compartment to another. With the exception, however, of
the north and south bulkhead pipes, which are quite free in the bore,
the passage of the oil is restricted by means of a wire partially
filling the bores of the pipes. By varying the size of wire used, the
restriction to the flow of the oil from one compartment to the others,
and therefore the rate at which the oil will flow when the sensitive
element tilts, can be regulated to give the degree of damping required
or to suit any change of viscosity in a fresh supply of oil.

The system in principle has much in common with the Brown method of
damping. Should the compass card suffer an easterly deflection, the
north point of the card will, as we know, tend to rise under the
influence of the earth’s rotation, and will continue to rise until
the turning moment applied by the deflected pendulum weight precesses
the card back to the meridian, whereafter the north point of the card
passing over towards the west will begin to fall towards the horizontal
plane, and then, descending still farther, it will once more come back
to the meridian. During this compound motion the oil in the trough
flows backwards and forwards, accumulating below the south point of the
card when the north point of the card is rising and gathering below the
north point when the north point is falling. In other words, there is
an excess weight of oil below the southern point of the card throughout
the complete half-swing from east to west, the maximum excess occurring
when the card is crossing the meridian. On the half-swing from west
to east the excess weight of oil is below the northern point of
the card, the maximum excess occurring, as before, when the card is
crossing the meridian. The excess weight of oil at all times thus tends
to increase the rise or dip of the north point of the card above or
below the horizontal plane, whereas the pendulum weight at all times
tends to diminish such rise or dip. Hence the excess weight of oil
tries to precess the card in the direction opposed to that in which the
pendulum weight is precessing it. The vibration of the card in this
compass, as in the Brown design, is therefore damped by the generation
of a counter-precessional tendency, and not, as in the early Anschütz
and the Sperry designs, by precessing the sensitive element in the
direction required to reduce the angle by which the pendulum weight is
tilted away from the plumb line.

From what we have already said regarding the Brown system of damping,
it will readily be inferred that there is no latitude error in the
Anschütz 1912 compass. The damping force is equivalent to a reduction
in the weight of the pendulum “bob,” and is not applied directly to
reduce the tilt of the bob. The tilt of the pendulum weight required
in north or south latitudes to provide the appropriate rate of
westerly or easterly precession is not opposed by the damping force
called into play by such tilt. Instead, the damping force merely makes
the bob lighter, so that the tilt has to be carried farther before
the _effective_ weight of the bob can balance the tilting action of
the earth’s rotation. The balance will be automatically struck when
the moment of the effective weight of the bob is just sufficient
to generate the required rate of westerly or easterly precession
appropriate to the latitude.

The arrangement of the three gyros at the corners of an equilateral
triangle and the general form given to the annular casing and the
rest of the sensitive element results in the distribution of the mass
of the sensitive element in a very uniform manner around the vertical
axis. There is no excessive concentration of the mass towards the east
and west plane, and as a result it is unnecessary to add compensator
weights to this compass in order to avoid the effects of centrifugal
force during quadrantal rolling.

[Illustration: FIG. 51. Sectional Elevation of Anschütz (1912) Compass.]

The gyro-wheels are made of a special quality of nickel steel, and
are mounted on axles of the de Laval type--that is to say, they are
tapered and made of very small diameter (about 0.15 in. at the parallel
ends)--in order that they may yield a little should the centre of
gravity of the wheel not be truly coincident with the centre line of
the shaft. The wheels are 5 in. in diameter, weigh 5 lb. 2 oz., and run
at 20,000 revolutions per minute. The motors are of the squirrel-cage
type with the rotor windings fixed to the wheels inside a recess
concentric with the axle. The field coils are fixed relatively to
the gyro casing. It is of interest to note that when the gyro-wheel
is being run up to its full speed--an operation taking about five
minutes to complete--the axle passes through three critical speeds.
These speeds are approximately 7000, 11,000, and 14,000 revolutions,
and are believed to be associated, the first with one end of the axle,
the second with the other end, and the third with a combined action
at both ends. During the period of running up the gyros the starting
current is, of course, heavier than the current taken to drive the
wheels at the top speed, and as a result a considerable temperature is
developed in the wheels and their casings. When, however, the gyros
have been running for some time at the top speed the temperature drops,
and throughout the compass remains fairly constant at about 150 deg.
Fahr. The viscosity of the damping oil, on the constancy of which the
constancy of the damping force depends, is therefore less affected by
external atmospheric changes of temperature than might be expected. The
oil used is a mineral one. It serves not only to damp the vibrations of
the card, but also to lubricate the gyro-axles. To this end, as shown
in Fig. 51, pipes are led down from each end of each axle to dip into
the oil trough, the flow of oil being induced by means of wicks inside
the pipes.

The method adopted for the transmission of the readings from the
master compass to the repeaters is of considerable interest. The
bowl C containing the mercury and the float is surrounded by two
semi-cylindrical strips P Q of silver-plated brass. At one of the gaps
between these strips the two abutting edges are faced with platinum.
The gap between these platinum faces is 0.11 in. in width, and into it
there is inserted, as shown in the plan view, a platinum-iridium ball
R, measuring 0.095 in. in diameter.

On the switchboard serving the compass there is a reversible motor, two
of the windings of which are constantly connected to a generator--the
same generator as serves the gyro-motors. The contact ball R is
connected to the third phase of the generator, while the two strips
P Q are connected to the third winding of the reversible motor, this
winding being duplicated in such a way that the motor revolves in one
direction or the other, according as the circuit is completed at the
ball R through the strip P or the strip Q. A commutator is mounted on
the axle of the reversible motor, and from it current is distributed
to the motors operating the repeaters and to the “follow-up” motor S
(Fig. 51). The latter motor is geared to the shaft carrying the bowl
C, and when started up by the reversible motor turns the bowl in the
direction required to restore the ball R to the middle of its slot, and
so break the connection with the strip P or Q. Thus when the ship’s
course is altered the bowl tends to rotate with the ship, but the ball
R is mounted on the sensitive element, and therefore maintains its
position. Contact is thus established between the ball and one of the
strips P Q, the reversible motor is set rotating in the appropriate
direction, and current is distributed to the “follow-up” motor S to
rotate the bowl relatively to the ship until the ball R is once more
lying midway in the gap. The tendency of the bowl to rotate with
the ship is thus counteracted; the action of the “follow-up” motor
practically results in the bowl being held in constant relationship to
the sensitive element substantially as though it were part thereof.
Simultaneously the cards of the repeaters are prevented from rotating
with the ship, so that virtually they, too, act as if rigidly connected
to the sensitive element, without, however, any frictional drag being
thrown from them on to the sensitive element.

As illustrating the refined construction of the entire compass, the
design of the ball contact may be noticed. The ball is carried at the
end of a tapered spiral spring. It is free to rotate on the spring
end, but is prevented from moving axially thereon. The spring end is
provided with a button. The ball is drilled out and beaded over the
button. To ensure good electrical contact at all times between the ball
and the spring a drop of mercury is carried inside the ball between it
and the button. Should the ship turn very suddenly the ball may spring
out of the gap and be dragged across the face of one or other of the
strips P Q. It is for this reason that these strips are silver-plated.

The repeater compasses are provided not only with an ordinary card
graduated from 0 deg. to 160 deg., but also with an inner dial which
makes one revolution for an alteration of 10 deg. in the ship’s
course. This dial is graduated to 1/10 deg., and permits very small
departures from the set course to be immediately noticed and corrected.
An elaboration of the same idea is provided in the multiple repeater
of the Brown compass. In this repeater the inner dial is the ordinary
360 deg. card. The outer annular dial makes four revolutions for
every complete turn of the ship. With the ship sailing due north the
graduations on the outer dial are numbered from 0 to 45 round the
east half of the dial, and from 360 to 315 round the west half. The
numbers, however, are not marked on the dial itself, but on the edges
of discs seen through slots in the dial. As the ship turns from the
north towards the east, the discs on the west side of the dial are
successively rotated one stage as the south end of the lubber line
passes over them, so as to exhibit numbers forming a continuation of
the numbers on the east side of the dial. The outer magnified dial is
thus of itself sufficient for navigational purposes.

In the Anschütz equipment arrangements are made for attaching an
azimuth mirror to the repeater dial for the purpose of providing
an artificial horizon during the taking of bearings. A separate
gyroscopically stabilised artificial horizon device, such as is
sometimes to be found on board ships, is thus rendered unnecessary.




INDEX


  Absence of latitude error in Anschütz (1912) compass, 158

  Absence of latitude error in Brown compass, 66

  Action of excentric pin in Sperry compass, 55 _et seq._

  Air-blast pressure, Brown compass, 61

  Anschütz (1910) compass--
    Air-blast damping system, 42 _et seq._
    Damping curve, 50
    Latitude error, cause of, 65
    -- -- correction for, 67
    -- -- value of, 68
    Magnitude of directive force at equator, 23
    Non-gyroscopic details, 138
    Period of vibration of axle, 33, 37
    Peripheral speed of wheel, 47
    Quadrantal error, 96, 107, 120
    Weight, diameter, and speed of wheel, 23
    Weight of sensitive element, 30
    Wheel tested to destruction, 140

  Anschütz (1912) compass--
    Absence of latitude error, 158
    Directive force, value of, 125
    Fourth gyro type, 128
    Gyro-wheels, details of, 159
    Non-gyroscopic details, 154
    Oil damping system, 156
    Quadrantal error, 107, 120, 126
    Repeater compasses, 162
    Temperature rise, 160
    Weight, diameter, and speed of wheels, 123


  Ballistic deflection and error, 81 _et seq._

  Ballistic deflection, dead-beat, 87

  Ballistic deflection, tests by British Admiralty, 89

  Ballistic gyro, Sperry compass, 111

  Brown compass--
    Absence of latitude error, 66
    Air-blast pressure, 61
    Compensator weights, 134
    Damping bottles, 61
    -- system, 59 _et seq._
    Generation of directive force, 116
    Magnitude of directive force at equator, 23
    Non-gyroscopic details, 148
    Oil control bottles, 113
    On due west course, 117
    Quadrantal error, 113, 126
    Repeater compasses, 154, 162
    Weight, diameter, and speed of wheel, 23
    Weight of sensitive element, 30


  Centrifugal forces during quadrantal rolling, 130 _et seq._

  Clock, gyroscopic, 16

  Compensator weights, 134

  Correction mechanism for latitude and north steaming errors, 75

  Course correction or cosine ring, 77


  Damped and free motion of gyro-axle, 49

  Damped and undamped vibrations, 35 _et seq._

  Damping curve, 50

  -- systems, 42, 43, 52, 59, 156

  -- vibrations of gyro-compass, 29

  Dead-beat ballistic deflection, 87

  Details of gyro-wheels, 23, 159

  Directive force, value of, at equator, 23, 125

  Directive force, effective, 28


  Effect of rolling on due west course, 93, 98, 99

  Effect of rolling on due north course, 94

  Effect of rolling on north-west course, 101

  Elementary gyro-compass, 18

  -- -- at equator, 20, 26

  -- -- at 55 deg. N. lat., 24

  -- -- near North Pole, 26

  Elementary gyroscope at equator, 15

  Elementary gyroscopic phenomena, 4 _et seq._

  Elimination of the quadrantal error, 107

  Excentric pin, action of, 55 _et seq._

  -- -- stabilisation of, 110, 112

  External gimbal mounting, 13, 97


  Fourth gyro type of Anschütz compass, 128

  Free and damped motion of gyro-axle, 49

  Friction, solid and fluid, 39, 40


  Generation of directive force, 18, 116

  German submarines, 96, 120, 128

  Gimbal mounting, external, 13, 97

  Gyro-axle, free and damped motion of, 49

  Gyroscope at equator, 15

  -- with three degrees of freedom, 4 _et seq._

  Gyroscope and rotation of the earth, 15

  Gyroscopic compass at equator, 20, 26

  Gyroscopic compass at 55 deg. N. lat., 24

  Gyroscopic compass near North Pole, 26

  Gyroscopic phenomena, elementary, 4 _et seq._

  Gyro-wheels, details of, 23, 159


  Latitude bail corrector, 69

  -- corrector dial, 76

  -- error, 65

  -- -- absence of, 66, 158

  -- -- cause of, 65, 66

  -- -- correction of, 67, 75

  -- -- value of, 68, 69, 75


  Magnetic compass, 1, 23, 30

  Magnitude of directive force at equator, 23, 125


  North steaming error, 70

  -- -- -- correction mechanism, 75

  -- -- -- value of, 74, 79


  Oil control bottles, 113

  -- damping system, 156


  Pendulum, simple, 31, 81

  Period of rolling of a ship, 95

  -- -- vibration of gyro-axle, 33, 37, 88

  Peripheral speed of gyro-wheel, 47

  Phantom ring, 53


  Quadrantal error, 91, 96, 107, 120

  Quadrantal error, elimination of, 107, 108, 113, 120, 126

  Quadrantal error, value of, 107

  -- rolling, centrifugal forces during, 130 _et seq._


  Repeater compasses, 79, 80, 146, 152, 162

  Rolling of a ship, period of, 95

  -- on due north course, 93, 98, 99

  -- -- -- west course, 94

  -- -- north-west course, 101

  -- quadrantal, centrifugal forces during, 130 _et seq._

  Rotation of the earth and the gyroscope, 15


  Simple pendulum, 31, 81

  Sperry compass--
    Bail, 54
    Ballistic gyro, 111
    Compensator weights, 134
    Course corrector or cosine ring, 77
    Damping system, 52
    Directive force, magnitude at equator, 23
    Excentric pin, action of, 55 _et seq._
    Excentric pin, stabilisation of, 110, 112
    Latitude bail corrector, 69
    -- corrector dial, 76
    -- error, cause of, 66
    -- -- correction of, 67, 75
    Latitude error, value of, 69
    Non-gyroscopic details, 142
    North steaming error, correction of, 75, _et seq._
    On north-west course, 108
    Phantom ring, 53
    Quadrantal error, 108, 126
    Repeater compasses, 146
    Speed correction dial, 77
    Vacuum in wheel casing, 52
    Weight, diameter, and speed of wheel, 23
    Weight of sensitive element, 30

  Submarines, German, 96, 120, 128


  Temperature rise in Anschütz compass, 160

  Test of Anschütz wheel to destruction, 140


  Vacuum in Sperry casing, 52

  Vibration period of Anschütz compass, 33, 37

  Vibration period of gyro-axle, standard, 88

  Vibrations, damped and undamped, 35 _et seq._


  Weight, diameter, and speed of gyro-wheel, 23, 123

  Weight of sensitive element, 30


  Printed in Great Britain at
  _The Mayflower Press, Plymouth_. William Brendon & Son, Ltd.




FOOTNOTES


[1] Earlier form as in use in 1910.

[2] Approximate. Differs in different compasses.

[3] The value of the latitude error is _b_ tan L, where L is the
angle of latitude and _b_ a constant dependent upon the design of the
compass. In the Sperry correction mechanism the value of the quantity
_b_ is represented by the distance between the centre of the dial B and
the centre of the pin C when the radial slot in the dial is lying at
right angles to the bar D E.

[4] The value of the north steaming error is numerically equal to (_a_
K cos C)/cos L, where K is the ship’s speed, L the angle of latitude, C
the angle between the course and the north and south direction, and _a_
a constant involving the speed of rotation of the earth. In the Sperry
correction mechanism the value of the quantity _a_ is represented by
the radius at which the pin L lies from the centre of the latitude dial.

[5] The ballistic deflection is dependent upon the _rate_ at which
the northerly component of the ship’s speed is being changed. The
difference in the north steaming errors is dependent upon the _initial_
and _final_ values of the speed towards the north, and would not
appear to be affected by the length of time occupied in changing the
speed. It would seem, therefore, that the ballistic deflection can
only be dead-beat in the chosen latitude if the speed towards the
north is reduced or increased at one particular rate. Thus if the
ship is steaming due north at 20 knots and changes its speed to 10
knots in (_a_) 10 minutes or (_b_) 5 minutes, the initial and final
values of the north steaming error will be the same in both cases,
since the initial and final speeds are the same, but the ballistic
deflection will be greater in the second case than in the first,
since the rate at which the speed is changed is greater. If, then,
the ballistic deflection is dead-beat in the first case it cannot be
so in the second. The statement that the ballistic deflection in the
chosen latitude is dead-beat thus appears, it may be suggested, to
require qualification. On the other hand, the British Admiralty in
connection with the use of gyro-compasses on destroyers and similar
fast-manœuvring vessels wherein the ballistic deflection is a factor
of very great importance has carried out lengthy experiments on the
matter, and, although the results have not been divulged, it is
understood that the ballistic deflection was found to be dead-beat
independently of the rate at which the speed was changed.

[6] The wheels in the two designs being similar in form, their moments
of inertia--the real factors determining the magnitude of the directive
forces--are proportional to the fourth powers of their diameters.
The fourth power of 5 is to the fourth power of 6 as 1 is to 2
approximately.

[7] The directive force is proportional to the sine of the angle of
deflection. The gyros K L M therefore supply at 30 deg. deflection
a total directive force of D sin 30 deg. + D sin 60 deg. + D sin 0
deg., or 1.366 D. For a single-gyro compass, having a wheel of twice
the inertia of K L or M separately, the directive force at 30 deg.
deflection would be 2 D sin 30 deg. or D.

[8] More precisely, the moment of inertia of the body must have a
constant value about the line J K, Fig. 43, at all angles of setting.




Transcriber’s Notes


Simple typographical errors were corrected.

When necessary, illustrations have been moved between paragraphs, so
some of the page references in the List of Illustrations are off by a
page or two. Links to those illustrations are correct.

Index not checked for proper alphabetization or correct page references.





End of Project Gutenberg's The Gyroscopic Compass, by T. W. Chalmers

*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE GYROSCOPIC COMPASS ***

***** This file should be named 57200-0.txt or 57200-0.zip *****
This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
        http://www.gutenberg.org/5/7/2/0/57200/

Produced by deaurider, Charlie Howard, and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
file was produced from images generously made available
by The Internet Archive)


Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
States without permission and without paying copyright
royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive
specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this
eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook
for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports,
performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given
away--you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks
not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the
trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
1.E.8.

1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
you share it without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
country outside the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

  This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
  most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
  restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
  under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
  eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
  United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you
  are located before using this ebook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg-tm License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
provided that

* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
  the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
  you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
  to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
  agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
  Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
  within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
  legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
  payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
  Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
  Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
  Literary Archive Foundation."

* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
  you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
  does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
  License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
  copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
  all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
  works.

* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
  any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
  electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
  receipt of the work.

* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
  distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and The
Project Gutenberg Trademark LLC, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm
trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm

Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
www.gutenberg.org Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.

The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the
mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its
volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous
locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt
Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to
date contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and
official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

For additional contact information:

    Dr. Gregory B. Newby
    Chief Executive and Director
    gbnewby@pglaf.org

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works.

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org

This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.